Expandable Cage with Compound-Angled Ramps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interbody fusion devices require precise dimensions for insertion into the intervertebral space, which can be challenging when the space has collapsed, necessitating additional hardware and invasive surgical techniques.

Innovation Solution

An expandable intervertebral body fusion device that can be inserted in a collapsed state and expanded in situ to a larger dimension, using compound-angled ramps and a drive mechanism to increase the distance between adjacent vertebrae and provide support during bone fusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If an interbody implant is inserted into the intervertebral space at full dimensions, then the implant can provide immediate structural support, but the surgical procedure becomes more invasive requiring larger incisions and greater tissue disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsurgical invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into two functional states: a compressed insertion state for minimally invasive delivery and an expanded functional state for structural support. The implant body is segmented into expandable chambers that can be inflated or extended after placement to achieve full dimensions within the intervertebral space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant transitions from a static small dimension form to a dynamic expanded form after insertion. This dynamic transformation allows the implant to adapt its size in situ, providing structural support only when needed while maintaining minimal invasiveness during the surgical insertion phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Volume of stationary object

If the intervertebral space has collapsed, then the available space for implant placement is reduced, but creating an opening large enough for a full-sized implant requires additional invasive hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervertebral spaceVSAvoidadditional hardware
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is pre-compressed to a reduced size before insertion, allowing it to pass through the collapsed intervertebral space without requiring additional expansion hardware. After successful placement, the implant is then expanded to its functional dimensions, eliminating the need for complex pre-expansion devices or large incisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The implant utilizes a dimensional transformation approach, transitioning from a compact one-dimensional insertion profile to a three-dimensional expanded structure within the intervertebral space. This dimensional change allows the implant to navigate through collapsed spaces while still achieving full volumetric support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If minimally invasive techniques are used with small incisions, then tissue disruption is minimized, but inserting an interbody implant becomes challenging when the intervertebral space is collapsed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue disruptionVSAvoidimplant insertion
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is segmented into a compressed delivery configuration and an expanded functional configuration. This segmentation allows the implant to be delivered through small incisions in a compact form while still providing full structural support after expansion, resolving the conflict between minimal tissue disruption and effective implant placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant's physical parameters (size, volume, dimensions) are changed between delivery and functional states. By controlling the expansion parameters after insertion, the implant can be delivered through minimally invasive pathways while achieving the necessary structural dimensions to address the collapsed intervertebral space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12290450B2Expandable cage
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 ASTURA MEDICAL INC
  • US12290450B2 patent drawing
  • US12290450B2 patent drawing
  • US12290450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable cage for placement between adjacent vertebrae having two or more upper and lower end plates having compound-angled slots, ramps or rails, and a drive means having corresponding compound-angled slots, ramps or rails configured to slidingly engage the compound-angled slots, ramps or rails of the two or more upper and lower end plates, wherein movement of the drive means in a first direction moves the two or more upper and lower end plates away from each other both vertically and horizontally to expand both a height and a width of the expandable cage from a collapsed state to an expanded state.