Expandable Interbody Implant With Screw-Linkage Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current intervertebral fusion devices for spinal surgery involve lengthy operations, risk of nerve injury, and hip pain due to bone graft harvesting, and require significant disc space destruction.

Innovation Solution

An expandable interbody device with a drive block, linkage block, and endplates that allow for minimally invasive insertion and expansion between vertebrae, providing stability and bone fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional intervertebral fusion devices are used, then spinal fusion can be achieved, but operation time is lengthy and there is risk of nerve injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal fusion successVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The intervertebral fusion device is divided into multiple segments including upper endplate, lower endplate, and body portion that can be assembled together. This segmentation allows for minimally invasive insertion where components are introduced separately through small incisions, significantly reducing operation time while maintaining fusion reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device components are designed to nest within each other during insertion. The body portion can be inserted within the endplates, and internal fixation elements can be nested within the body portion. This nested configuration enables all components to be introduced through a single small incision, reducing surgical time and eliminating the need for large incisions that expose nerves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If traditional intervertebral fusion devices are used, then spinal fusion can be achieved, but there is risk of nerve injury due to significant disc space destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal fusion successVSAvoidnerve injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the device into separately insertable components, the surgery requires minimal disc space preparation. The endplates and body portion can be introduced through small corridors without requiring extensive removal of disc material, thereby protecting surrounding nerves from injury while still achieving reliable spinal fusion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device is pre-assembled or pre-positioned in a compact configuration that allows insertion through a small working corridor before expansion or final positioning. This preliminary configuration minimizes the need for large incisions and extensive disc space preparation, reducing nerve exposure and injury risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If traditional intervertebral fusion devices are used, then spinal fusion can be achieved, but hip pain occurs due to bone graft harvesting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal fusion successVSAvoidhip pain
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the need for autologous bone graft harvesting from the surgical procedure. The device itself provides the necessary structural support and osteogenic elements, eliminating the need to harvest bone from the patient's hip. This removes the source of post-operative hip pain while maintaining successful fusion outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates synthetic or allograft bone substitute materials that replace the need for autologous bone grafts. These materials provide the necessary osteogenic function without requiring hip bone harvesting, eliminating hip pain while achieving reliable spinal fusion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If traditional intervertebral fusion devices are used, then spinal fusion can be achieved, but significant disc space destruction is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal fusion successVSAvoiddisc space destruction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented device design allows components to be inserted through small working corridors with minimal disc space preparation. The endplates can be introduced separately from the body portion, requiring only small channels rather than large open spaces, thereby preserving more of the native disc space structure while achieving reliable fusion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates faster, safer spinal fusion with reduced nerve damage and hip pain by allowing for minimal retraction and enhanced bone formation.

Implementation Method 1

a drive screw threadingly disposed within the other of the linkage block opening or the drive block opening... during rotation of the drive screw a distance between the drive block opening and the linkage block opening is caused to change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS12594169B2Expandable interbody
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 MIRUS LLC
  • US12594169B2 patent drawing
  • US12594169B2 patent drawing
  • US12594169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable interbody device used as a prosthesis during spinal surgery. The expandable interbody device is configured to be inserted into the space between spinal disks to provide stability. The expandable interbody device includes a drive block, a linkage block, a drive screw, a first endplate, a second endplate, and at least two linkages. Rotation of the drive screw causes movement of the linkage block relative to the drive block and/or movement of the first endplate relative to the second endplate.