Expandable Interspinous-Interlaminar Implants for Adjustable Distraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interspinous-interlaminar stabilization systems are invasive and lack an adjustable level of distraction between affected vertebrae, often interfering with multiple levels and failing to provide reliable spacing maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic implant system with a resilient block and rotatable members that expand and contract to maintain spacing between spinous processes and laminae, featuring a threaded member to transition between retracted and deployed configurations, and hinges for rotational coupling, allowing adjustable distraction and stabilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional interspinous-interlaminar implants are used to maintain spacing between vertebrae, then stabilization is achieved, but the implants are invasive and cannot be adjusted for different levels of distraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustable distraction levelVSAvoidimplant structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant incorporates a resilient block that can be compressed and expanded to provide adjustable distraction between vertebrae. The block's resilient nature allows it to dynamically adapt to different compression forces and maintain variable spacing, transforming a static implant into a dynamic, adjustable stabilization device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant allows surgeons to adjust the distraction level by compressing the resilient block to different degrees during insertion. By changing the compression parameter of the resilient block, the implant can provide different levels of vertebral spacing to match specific patient needs and pathological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple adjacent vertebral levels are treated with implants, then comprehensive stabilization is achieved, but implants interfere with each other

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization effectivenessVSAvoidimplant occupation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient block is nested within a housing structure that contains superior and inferior members. This nested configuration allows the implant to be compact when not in use and expand only when needed at the specific vertebral level, enabling multiple implants to be placed at adjacent levels without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The implant is divided into distinct segments including the resilient block, housing, superior member, and inferior member. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently and enables the implant to be positioned at multiple vertebral levels without the components of adjacent implants interfering with each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If larger incisions are made to accommodate traditional implants, then implant placement is facilitated, but recovery time increases and patient trauma increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant placementVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The implant can be inserted in a compressed state through smaller incisions and then expanded to its functional size once positioned between the vertebrae. This dynamic insertion capability allows surgeons to use minimally invasive approaches while still achieving the necessary stabilization effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient block is pre-compressed to a compact size before insertion, allowing it to pass through small incisions. After placement, the block is released from compression and expands to its functional size, providing the required distraction. This preliminary compression action enables minimally invasive implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable placement with smaller incisions, less intrusive implants, and shorter recovery times, providing adjustable distraction and stabilization between vertebrae while minimizing nerve compression.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient block configured to move within a cavity between the superior member and the inferior member such that, with the dynamic implant in a deployed configuration, the resilient block may urge the superior member and the inferior member to move apart

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a threaded member configured to rotatably engage the resilient block such that rotation of the threaded member may urge the resilient block to translate distally thereby urging the dynamic implant to move from a retracted configuration to the deployed configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 3

a superior hinge configured to rotatably couple the superior member and the interconnecting member, and an inferior hinge configured to rotatably couple the inferior member and the interconnecting member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS20250248702A1Expandable interspinous-interlaminar stabilization systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 AMPLIO SPINE LLC
  • US20250248702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248702A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may be configured to maintain spacing between a superior spinous process and lamina, and an inferior spinous process and lamina, of adjacent vertebrae. The system may include a dynamic implant having an implanted position. The dynamic implant may include an interconnecting member having a proximal superior surface having a superior concavity shaped to receive the superior spinous process, and a proximal inferior surface having an inferior concavity shaped to receive the inferior spinous process. The dynamic implant may also include a superior member having a distal superior surface, that faces the superior lamina in the implanted position, an inferior member having a distal inferior surface, that faces the inferior lamina in the implanted position, and a resilient block configured to move within a cavity between the superior and inferior members such that, the resilient block may urge the superior and inferior members to move apart.