Expandable Shipping Package with Control Tacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shipping packages are inefficient due to their generic design, leading to increased costs, product damage, and consumer dissatisfaction, as they often require additional packaging materials and steps for protection, are not customizable, and are prone to damage from environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A flexible shipping package with expandable chambers and gussets that can be shaped to fit specific products, using layers of flexible materials with expansion control tacks to provide structural integrity and protection, allowing for easy handling and stacking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If generic flexible pouches or boxes are used for shipping, then the package is easy to manufacture and low cost, but additional packaging materials are required to protect products and significant volume is wasted due to ill-fitting packaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The package utilizes expandable chambers that can be inflated to transform the package from a flat, compact state to a three-dimensional protective structure. This dynamic transformation allows the package to adapt its volume and shape to fit different product sizes, reducing wasted space and material usage while maintaining ease of manufacture in the collapsed state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The package structure changes its physical parameters (volume, shape, rigidity) through the expansion of internal chambers. By controlling the inflation state of these chambers, the package can adjust its protective characteristics and fit different product dimensions, eliminating the need for additional packaging materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If additional protective materials and processes are used to ensure product safety in generic packages, then product protection is improved, but the packaging process becomes more complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protectionVSAvoidpackaging process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The package is divided into multiple expandable chambers that can be independently inflated to provide targeted protection for different areas of the product. This segmented structure allows for customized protection levels in different zones without requiring complex assembly processes or additional materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The expandable chambers are designed to be inflated by the end user or automatically, providing the protective structure without requiring complex pre-assembly or specialized packaging processes. The package essentially creates its own protective structure through simple expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Weight of moving object

If flexible materials are used for shipping packages, then the package is lightweight and cost-effective, but the package is difficult to transport on conveyor equipment and difficult to stack

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidhandling and stacking
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The package transitions from a flexible, flat state during storage and transport to a rigid, three-dimensional expanded state during product protection and handling. This dynamic state change allows the package to maintain lightweight properties when collapsed while providing the structural integrity needed for conveyor transport and stacking when expanded

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The package undergoes parameter changes in rigidity and shape through chamber expansion. In the collapsed state, the package is flexible and lightweight for efficient storage and transport. When expanded, the rigidified structure provides stable stacking characteristics and compatibility with conveyor equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If non-expandable flexible packages are used, then the package structure is simple, but the package cannot provide custom fit for products leading to wasted volume and additional packaging requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage structureVSAvoidshipping volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The package structure dynamically adjusts its volume and shape through the expansion of internal chambers, allowing it to conform to different product dimensions. This dynamic adaptation eliminates wasted shipping volume and reduces the need for additional packaging materials while maintaining relatively simple package construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3823912B1Shaped flexible shipping package and method of making
Publication Date: 2024.10.30 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP3823912B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3823912B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3823912B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A shipping package having a flexible inner sheet having a first surface and a second surface. The package has an article reservoir for accepting an article to be shipped and one or more expansion chambers. The expansion chambers can be inflated or otherwise expanded to provide structure to the package and to protect the article in the article reservoir.