Expandable Intervertebral Spacer for In Situ Fit Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing expandable intervertebral spacers lack improvements for optimizing fit and reducing impaction during implantation, necessitating better designs for spinal stabilization.

Innovation Solution

The design of an expandable spacer comprising a main body, endplates, a driving member, pins, and an actuation member, allowing for controlled expansion in situ by transitioning between configurations through rotational movement of the actuation member, which forces the driving member to move linearly and separate the endplates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a static intervertebral spacer with fixed dimensions is used, then the device structure is simple, but the fit optimization is limited and trial-and-error selection is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit optimizationVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer incorporates an expandable structure with multiple configurations that can be adjusted in situ. The expandable body transitions between compressed and expanded states, allowing the clinician to optimize the fit between vertebral bodies after implantation, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer utilizes a nested configuration where the expandable body is contained within a delivery system in a compressed state, then expanded to its functional configuration after implantation. This nesting approach enables a complex expandable structure to be delivered through a simpler delivery mechanism, addressing both fit optimization and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a static spacer is used, then the device is easier to manufacture, but impaction of adjacent vertebral bodies occurs during insertion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpaction of vertebral bodiesVSAvoiddevice manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer is designed to be inserted in a compressed state and then expanded in situ to its functional size. This dynamic approach eliminates the need to force a fully-sized spacer into the intervertebral space, thereby preventing impaction of adjacent vertebral bodies during insertion while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer is prepared in a pre-compressed configuration before insertion, allowing it to be delivered through the delivery system without impacting the vertebral bodies. The expansion to full size occurs after proper positioning, preventing harmful impaction forces during the insertion process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If trial-and-error selection of spacer size is performed, then the appropriate fit can be identified, but the procedure time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacer fit precisionVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable spacer allows the clinician to implant a single spacer and then adjust its size in situ by controlling the expansion degree. This eliminates the need for multiple trial-and-error insertions of different sized spacers, thereby achieving precise fit while significantly reducing procedure time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer's key parameter (size/volume) can be changed dynamically after implantation through controlled expansion. This parameter adjustment capability allows precise fit optimization without requiring multiple surgical interventions or trial spacers, resolving the time-precision contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design optimizes the fit of the spacer between vertebral bodies, reducing the need for trial-and-error selection and minimizing impaction during insertion, thereby enhancing spinal stabilization and nerve protection.

Implementation Method 1

The actuation member is configured to be inserted into the driving member to transition the expandable spacer from a first configuration to a second configuration. The plurality of pins has at least two pins, each pin includes a first end and a second end. The first end or the second end of each pin passes through and is received by one opening disposed on the main body, one opening disposed on the first endplate, one opening disposed on the second endplate, and one opening disposed on the driving member to assemble the main body, the first endplate, the second endplate, and the driving member together.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS12544235B2Expandable intervertebral spacers
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 DEGEN MEDICAL INC
  • US12544235B2 patent drawing
  • US12544235B2 patent drawing
  • US12544235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The description relates to an expandable intervertebral spacer configured to engage an intervertebral disk. An example expandable spacer includes a main body, a first endplate, a second endplate, a driving member, a plurality of pins, and an actuation member. The expandable spacer is configured to transition from a first configuration to a second configuration by various structures (e.g., steps, faceted surfaces, curved surfaces, multi-faceted portions) defined on the first endplate, the second endplate, and the driving member.