Expandable Intervertebral Spacer with Central Gear Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical techniques for inserting intervertebral spacers via a posterior approach often damage nerve roots due to their width being wider than the space between nerve roots, requiring retraction of these roots for spacer insertion.

Innovation Solution

An expandable intervertebral spacer with rotatable L-shaped arms that retract within the body to fit between nerve roots and deploy once inside, increasing height and width to stabilize vertebrae without needing nerve root retraction, utilizing a central gear mechanism for simultaneous deployment of arms in alternating directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a spacer of sufficient width is used to stabilize vertebrae, then stabilization effectiveness is improved, but the spacer cannot be inserted without retracting nerve roots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization effectivenessVSAvoidnerve root damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer is divided into a body portion and multiple deployable arms. The body portion has a narrow width for insertion between nerve roots, while the arms can be deployed laterally to increase the overall width and provide stable vertebral support without requiring nerve root retraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The arms are nested within the body portion during insertion, allowing the spacer to pass between nerve roots in a compact configuration. After insertion, the arms are deployed outward from the body to achieve the required width for stabilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If the spacer width is reduced to fit between nerve roots, then insertion without retraction is enabled, but the base for stabilization becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidstabilization base
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer transitions from a static narrow configuration during insertion to a dynamic expanded configuration after insertion. The arms are deployable and adjustable, allowing the spacer to adapt its width to provide adequate stabilization base while maintaining ease of insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer utilizes the lateral dimension by deploying arms perpendicular to the insertion direction. This allows the spacer to maintain a narrow profile in the insertion direction (fitting between nerve roots) while expanding in the lateral dimension to provide sufficient stabilization base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If multiple arms are deployed in alternating directions, then symmetric expansion is achieved, but complex deployment mechanism is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymmetric expansionVSAvoiddeployment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple arm deployment mechanisms are merged into a single integrated system. A central gear mechanism controls the deployment of all arms simultaneously, coordinating their motion in alternating directions to achieve symmetric expansion without requiring separate control systems for each arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

A central gear acts as an intermediary mechanism that translates rotational motion into coordinated lateral movement of multiple arms. The gear system synchronizes the deployment of arms in alternating directions, achieving symmetric expansion while simplifying the overall control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the insertion of spacers without retracting nerve roots, providing a stable base for vertebrae stabilization by expanding to match the intervertebral space dimensions, thus minimizing surgical complications and promoting effective spinal stabilization.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a central gear mechanism for simultaneous deployment of arms in alternating directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Data Source

PatentUS8394145B2Expandable intervertebral spacer and method of posterior insertion thereof
Publication Date: 2013.03.12 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US8394145B2 patent drawing
  • US8394145B2 patent drawing
  • US8394145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable intervertebral spacer has a plurality of arms. The arms can be retracted or extended. The spacer has a width that is narrower than the width between the nerve roots near the posterior approach to an intervertebral space. Once inserted into the intervertebral space, the arms can be deployed. The deployed arms expand the height and width of the spacer. Once deployed, the spacer stabilizes two adjacent vertebrae. The arms are interconnected mechanically to deploy simultaneously.