Expandable Interbody Spacers for Precise Height and Lordotic Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intervertebral implants with fixed dimensions often fail to provide adequate height restoration and support between vertebral bodies, requiring invasive procedures due to their larger pre-implantation size and limited ability to correct spinal curvature.

Innovation Solution

Expandable interbody spacers that can be inserted along one axis and expanded both horizontally and vertically, allowing for in situ expansion to fit the intervertebral space and provide lordotic correction, using a single axial force to pivotally link support members and end bodies for symmetrical or asymmetrical expansion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If fixed dimension cages are used, then implantation is simpler, but height restoration precision and spinal support adequacy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight restoration precisionVSAvoidimplantation procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cage transitions from a fixed static structure to a dynamic expandable structure. The cage body can be compressed to a smaller insertion profile and then expanded in situ to the desired final dimensions, allowing precise height restoration while maintaining simpler initial implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage is designed with nested or telescoping components that allow the structure to be compressed into a smaller insertion profile. The cage body, end plates, and expansion mechanisms are arranged to fit within each other during insertion, then deployed to achieve the final expanded configuration for precise spinal support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If fixed size cages are used, then device structure is simpler, but invasiveness of procedure increases due to larger pre-implantation size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvasiveness of implantationVSAvoidcage structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cage employs dynamic compression and expansion mechanisms that allow it to be delivered in a compressed low-profile state through less invasive approaches, then expanded to the required size at the implantation site. This reduces tissue disruption and surgical invasiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage utilizes dimensional transformation by compressing the structure along one axis (reducing length/profile for insertion) and then expanding along perpendicular axes (restoring height and width for spinal support). This dimensional reconfiguration enables less invasive delivery while maintaining adequate final dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed dimension cages are used, then device design is simpler, but adaptability to different spinal curvatures and heights deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to spinal curvatureVSAvoidcage design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cage incorporates dynamic adjustment capabilities that allow it to be expanded to different heights and angles depending on the specific spinal pathology and anatomical requirements. The expansion mechanism can achieve various final configurations from a single device design, providing adaptability to different spinal curvatures and intervertebral space dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage design includes asymmetric expansion capabilities with different expansion potentials in different directions. The structure can be expanded more in the vertical direction for height restoration or in the horizontal direction for lateral spacing, or combination thereof, allowing customization to match specific spinal anatomical variations and pathological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The expandable spacers offer precise height restoration and support, reducing the invasiveness of implantation procedures while allowing for customized lordotic correction, enhancing spinal stability and alignment.

Implementation Method 1

using a single axial force to pivotally link support members and end bodies for symmetrical or asymmetrical expansion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivotal linkage: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS20250213372A1Expandable intervertebral implants
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 AMPLIFY SURGICAL INC
  • US20250213372A1 patent drawing
  • US20250213372A1 patent drawing
  • US20250213372A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Interbody spacers are expandable horizontally and vertically by an application of axial force, and lockable in an expanded configuration. The spacers include support members interconnected to end bodies by pivotable link members. The spacers are introduced between vertebral bodies in a compressed configuration and expanded to fill the intervertebral space and provide support and selective lordotic correction. Graft material may be introduced into the expanded spacer. Provisional and/or supplementary locking means lock the spacers in the expanded configuration. Embodiments of the spacers include symmetrically and asymmetrically configured spacers. Methods of expansion include symmetric expansion or asymmetric expansion along each of two directions.