Expandable Spinal Cage with Linked Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal implants fail to effectively expand and distract vertebral end plates, leading to poor interface between bone and biomaterial, resulting in nonunion and 'flatback syndrome' due to lack of resistance to movement and inadequate space for neural elements.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant with a contracted configuration for easy insertion and an expandable configuration, featuring extendable support elements and a locking system that mechanically engages to lock the implant in place, using hydraulic or mechanical means to adjust and stabilize vertebral positions, thereby providing controlled spinal correction in three dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a static spacer is used for interbody stabilization, then the device is simple to insert, but it cannot expand to effectively distract end plates and provides poor interface between bone and biomaterial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of insertionVSAvoidinterface stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant transitions from a static configuration during insertion to a dynamically expandable configuration after placement. The expandable cage can be adjusted post-insertion to optimize distraction force and interface stability, resolving the contradiction between ease of insertion and interface stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant uses a nested structure where the cage expands from a compact inserted state to a larger stabilized state. The locking mechanism nests within the cage structure, allowing the device to maintain simplicity during insertion while providing complexity for stable fixation after placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Device complexity

If conventional static spacers are used, then the device structure is simple, but it cannot maintain interbody lordosis and contributes to flatback syndrome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidspinal alignment maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable cage allows dynamic adjustment of the implant's height and angle after insertion, enabling maintenance of interbody lordosis and prevention of flatback syndrome while keeping the base structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant enables change in geometric parameters (height, angle, expansion ratio) after insertion to maintain proper spinal alignment and lordosis, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and alignment maintenance capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If static cages are used, then the implant is simple, but it does not reliably improve space for neural elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant structureVSAvoidintervertebral space
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable cage can be adjusted post-insertion to optimize the intervertebral space height, reliably improving space for neural elements while maintaining a relatively simple base structure that expands as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional static spacers are used, then the device is simple to manufacture, but it forms a weak interface between bone and biomaterial due to poor resistance to movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbone-implant interface strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable cage allows for post-manufacturing adjustment to optimize the interface strength between bone and biomaterial. The simple manufacturing process is maintained while the expandable feature enables strong fixation through controlled distraction and locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8696751B2Adjustable distraction cage with linked locking mechanisms
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 VB SPINE LLC
  • US8696751B2 patent drawing
  • US8696751B2 patent drawing
  • US8696751B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal implant which is configured to be deployed between adjacent vertebral bodies. The implant has at least one extendable support element with a refracted configuration to facilitate deployment of the implant and an extended configuration so as to expand the implant and effectively distract the disc space, stabilize the motion segments and eliminate pathologic spine motion. The implant has a minimal dimension in its unexpanded state that is smaller than the dimensions of the neuroforamen through which it typically passes to be deployed within the intervertebral space. The implant is provided with a locking system having a plurality of linked locking elements that work in unison to lock the implant in an extended configuration. Bone engaging anchors also may be provided to ensure secure positioning.