Expandable Spinal Implant With Fluid-Driven Control Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal interbody and intravertebral devices are static in size, making them unsuitable for microsurgery and arthroscopic procedures, as they need to be large to effectively bridge vertebral gaps, limiting their applicability and surgical flexibility.

Innovation Solution

Development of expandable spinal implants with a top and bottom support assembly and a control mechanism that allows the device to transition between a collapsed and expanded position, enabling adjustable placement and alignment between vertebral bones, facilitating easier insertion and customized fit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static sized spinal devices are made large to bridge vertebral gaps, then they provide adequate structural support, but they cannot be used in microsurgery or arthroscopic surgery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical applicabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal device transitions from a static size to a dynamic, adjustable size through an expandable mechanism. The device is inserted in a compressed state and then expanded to its functional size within the vertebral space, allowing it to be used in both minimally invasive procedures and traditional spinal surgeries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs a nested structure where the support members are positioned within a containment structure during insertion, similar to nested dolls. The containment structure is then removed or expanded to allow the support members to achieve their full functional size and configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If static sized spinal devices are made large to provide adequate support, then they maintain structural stability, but they limit surgical flexibility and minimally invasive approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsurgical flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides structural reliability in its expanded state while enabling surgical flexibility through its compressed insertion state. The dynamic expansion mechanism allows the device to transition from a compact form suitable for minimally invasive approaches to a fully supported configuration within the vertebral space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is prepared in a preliminary compressed state that facilitates easy insertion through small incisions and narrow surgical corridors. Once positioned, the device is then expanded to provide the necessary structural support, separating the insertion phase from the support-providing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If expandable devices are designed to be adjustable in size, then they accommodate varying patient anatomy, but they increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomizable fitVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable mechanism provides customizable fit through controlled adjustment of support member dimensions. The device includes actuation mechanisms that allow the surgeon to expand the device to the specific size required for each patient's anatomical variations, while the overall structure remains relatively simple and robust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11986398B2Expandable implant assembly
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 LIFE SPINE INC
  • US11986398B2 patent drawing
  • US11986398B2 patent drawing
  • US11986398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable implant includes a top support configured to engage a first portion of vertebral bone, a bottom support configured to engage a second portion of vertebral bone, and a control assembly coupled to the top support and the bottom support and configured to control relative movement between the top support and the bottom support. The control assembly includes a control member including a head and a body portion. The head includes a recess and the body portion includes at least one access port in fluid communication with the recess to enable delivery of fluid to an interior of the implant via the recess and at least one access port.