Laterally Expandable Spinal Implant With Pivoting Wings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spinal implants often experience subsidence into vertebral endplates due to limited contact area and instability, leading to recurring back pain and compromised spinal stability, as they are difficult to optimally place and secure within the intervertebral disc space.

Innovation Solution

A laterally expandable spinal implant with pivoting wings and shaft-driven wedges that expand to secure against vertebral endplates, increasing contact area and stability by distributing load more evenly and facilitating bone growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spinal implants are used with limited contact area, then implant placement is simpler, but implant subsidence into vertebral endplates occurs and spinal stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilityVSAvoidimplant structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into a central body and multiple expandable wings that can be independently deployed. The wings are initially contained within the central body in a compressed state, then expanded laterally to increase contact area with vertebral endplates, thereby improving spinal stability without compromising implantation simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant transitions from a static, fixed-geometry structure to a dynamic, adaptable structure. The wings can expand and contract laterally in response to applied forces, allowing the implant to adapt its contact area with the vertebral endplates to optimize both initial placement and long-term stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If spinal implant contact area with endplates is limited, then implant insertion is easier, but bone growth is limited and fusion outcomes are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant insertionVSAvoidbone growth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant expands from a one-dimensional linear structure to a two-dimensional or three-dimensional structure by deploying wings laterally in the radial dimension. This dimensional transition dramatically increases the contact surface area with vertebral endplates, providing enhanced mechanical support for bone growth while maintaining straightforward insertion through the intervertebral disc space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If implant subsides into vertebral endplates over time, then initial implantation is simpler, but pain relief duration is reduced and spinal stability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation processVSAvoidpain relief duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The implant modifies its physical parameters over time through controlled expansion. The wings are initially compressed during insertion to facilitate easy implantation, then gradually expand to increase contact area and distribute loads more effectively, preventing subsidence and extending the duration of pain relief and spinal stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate components are used for spinal implant, then component assembly is more flexible, but optimal placement within intervertebral disc space becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent assemblyVSAvoidplacement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functional components (central body, wings, expansion mechanism) are merged into a single integrated implant unit. This unified structure maintains the adaptability and versatility of multiple components while eliminating the complexity of assembling and positioning separate pieces within the constrained intervertebral disc space, ensuring optimal placement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances spinal stability and bone growth, reduces the likelihood of implant subsidence, and extends the duration of pain relief by securely fixing the implant, thereby improving fusion outcomes and reducing surgical effort.

Implementation Method 1

shaft-driven wedges coupled with the wings and adapted to force the wedges out laterally from the central body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical expansion: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

wings may pivot along a hinge axis to swing outward from the implant central body until they press against vertebral endplates superior and inferior

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction and normal force: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20200246157A1Laterally expandable spinal implant
Publication Date: 2020.08.06 BERRY BRET MICHAEL
  • US20200246157A1 patent drawing
  • US20200246157A1 patent drawing
  • US20200246157A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and associated methods relate to a laterally expandable spinal implant configured with pivoting wings adapted to secure the implant when inserted between vertebrae with stabilizing force applied to the vertebrae by shaft-driven wedges coupled with the wings. In an illustrative example, the wings may pivot along a hinge axis to swing outward from the implant central body until they press against vertebral endplates superior and inferior. The hinge may be, for example, disposed longitudinally to the implant central body. In some examples, four wings may be mounted axially in the implant central body. Some embodiments may include shaft-driven wedges coupled with the wings and adapted to force the wedges out laterally from the central body. Various examples may advantageously provide improved post-implant spinal stability, enhanced post-implant bone growth, and increased implant contact area with bone, based on the implant pressing the wings against the endplates as the shaft rotates.