Expandable Spinal Interbody Assembly for Microsurgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal interbody and intravertebral devices are static in size, making them unsuitable for microsurgery and arthroscopic procedures, as they need to be large to effectively bridge vertebral gaps, limiting their applicability and surgical flexibility.

Innovation Solution

Development of expandable spinal implants with a top support assembly, bottom support assembly, and a control assembly that allows the implants to transition between a collapsed and expanded position, enabling adjustable positioning between vertebral bones for customized spacing and stabilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static sized spinal devices are made large to properly bridge the gap between adjacent vertebrae, then the support and fusion promotion function is improved, but the device cannot be used in microsurgery or arthroscopic surgery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to different surgical proceduresVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal device incorporates an expandable structure that transitions from a compressed low-profile configuration for minimally invasive insertion to an expanded configuration that provides adequate vertebral support. The device includes expandable elements such as balloons or mechanical expansion mechanisms that allow the surgeon to inflate or expand the device after insertion, transforming it from a small insertion profile to a larger functional size within the vertebral space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If static sized spinal devices are made large to effectively bridge vertebral gaps, then the bridging function is improved, but the insertion difficulty increases for microsurgery and arthroscopic procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebridging functionVSAvoidinsertion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal device employs a nested or telescoping structure where the expandable elements are contained within a delivery catheter or insertion device. The device is compressed or folded into a compact form that fits within the delivery system, allowing percutaneous or arthroscopic insertion. After proper positioning is achieved, the device is expanded from its nested state to provide the necessary structural support and bridging function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If static interbody devices are used, then the device structure is simple, but the surgeon cannot adjust the spacing between vertebrae

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of spacingVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates expandable elements with control mechanisms that allow the surgeon to adjust the degree of expansion and thus the spacing between vertebrae. This may include inflatable balloons with controlled fluid delivery, mechanical expansion systems with adjustable stop positions, or shape memory materials that can be activated to specific degrees of expansion. The dynamic nature of the device provides customizable spacing while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The expandable implants facilitate easier insertion and customizable spacing between vertebrae, enhancing surgical flexibility and support, particularly in microsurgical and arthroscopic procedures, while promoting bone growth and stabilization.

Implementation Method 1

a control assembly coupled to the top support assembly and the bottom support assembly and configured to control relative movement between the top support assembly and the bottom support assembly between a collapsed position and an expanded position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical expansion: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10383741B2Expandable spinal interbody assembly
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 LIFE SPINE INC
  • US10383741B2 patent drawing
  • US10383741B2 patent drawing
  • US10383741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable implant includes a top support assembly defining an upper surface configured to engage a first portion of vertebral bone; a bottom support assembly defining a lower surface configured to engage a second portion of vertebral bone; and a control assembly coupled to the top support assembly and the bottom support assembly and configured to control relative movement between the top support assembly and the bottom support assembly between a collapsed position and an expanded position. In the collapsed position, the upper surface is generally parallel to the lower surface, and in the expanded position, a portion of the upper surface extends at an acute angle relative to a portion of the lower surface.