Expandable Spinous Process Fixation for Stable Fusion Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices fail to provide effective structural stability and supplemental fusion for adjacent vertebrae to treat conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, trauma, and tumors, while minimizing damage to the spinous processes.

Innovation Solution

An implantable device with an expandable central barrel and lordotic plates, featuring projections that engage the spinous processes, allows for distraction and immobilization, and includes a mechanism to angulate and lock into position, providing support and fusion without excessive force on the spinous processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fusion devices are used to provide structural stability and supplemental fusion, then spinal conditions can be treated, but excessive force is applied to the spinous processes causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddamage to spinous processes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the stabilization function into two separate components: the expandable cage handles compression and fusion support, while the distractor handles distraction and spinous process spacing. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function without subjecting the spinous processes to excessive combined forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The distractor acts as an intermediary mechanism between the implant and the spinous processes. It provides controlled distraction and spacing while the cage provides structural support, thereby mediating the forces applied to the spinous processes and preventing direct excessive loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the spine is stabilized using rigid fusion devices, then structural support is provided, but normal physiologic motion is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidphysiologic motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device transitions from a static rigid fusion construct to a dynamic system where the expandable cage can be adjusted post-implantation. The cage expands from a compressed delivery state to a larger functional state, allowing adaptation to the patient's anatomy and motion requirements while providing structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes parameter changes in the form of expandability. The cage volume and compression force can be adjusted after implantation by inflating or expanding the cage structure, allowing optimization of both structural support and preservation of physiologic motion based on patient-specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the expandable cage is inflated or expanded after implantation, then structural support is enhanced, but the delivery system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddelivery system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable cage is nested within the delivery system during implantation. The compressed cage fits inside the delivery catheter or inserter, allowing minimally invasive placement. After positioning, the cage is expanded in situ, eliminating the need for complex external expansion mechanisms while maintaining the expandable functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure is designed to be self-expanding or self-inflating after implantation. The expansion mechanism is integrated into the cage itself rather than requiring separate external actuation systems, simplifying the overall delivery system while maintaining the ability to enhance structural support post-implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260013910A1Spinous process fixation system and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US20260013910A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013910A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013910A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An implantable device may include a barrel, the barrel having an upper portion and a lower portion. The implantable device may further include an actuator assembly disposed in the barrel, and a central screw that extends from a rear ramped actuator through a front ramped actuator. The implantable device may further include a first plate having multiple projections extending from one side of the first plate. The implantable device may further include a second plate having multiple projections extending from one side of the second plate, the second plate configured to be received on the central screw. The barrel may be configured to transition from a collapsed form having a first height to an expanded form having a second height and wherein the second height is greater than the first height.