Expanded Starch Packaging via 3D Printing for Custom Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current packaging solutions often result in product damage and increased shipping costs due to inadequate design and wasted space, as they are either one-size-fits-all or excessively expensive custom solutions.

Innovation Solution

An expanded starch packaging system utilizing additive manufacturing and 3D printing to create custom, lightweight, and protective packaging tailored to the specific item, using a combination of starch material, shellac coating, and on-demand printing for optimal fit and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If one-size-fits-all packaging is used, then device complexity is reduced, but product protection is insufficient and shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging design complexityVSAvoidproduct protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging system transitions from static pre-designed boxes to dynamic custom-fit packaging generated through 3D scanning and additive manufacturing. The system adapts to each item's specific dimensions and shape requirements, providing optimal protection while maintaining operational simplicity through automated scanning and printing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging parameters (size, shape, material density) are dynamically adjusted based on the scanned item characteristics. The additive manufacturing process varies material deposition parameters to create packaging with optimal protection properties for each specific item, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If custom packaging is designed for each item, then product protection is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protectionVSAvoidpackaging cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses biodegradable starch-based materials for additive manufacturing, creating disposable packaging that is inexpensive to produce. The materials are naturally decomposable, eliminating the need for expensive durable packaging solutions while maintaining adequate protection for single-use shipping scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The additive manufacturing process optimizes material usage by precisely depositing starch-based material only where needed, reducing waste compared to traditional cutting and assembly methods. The variable layer thickness and material density parameters allow cost-effective production tailored to each item's protection requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If standard sized packages are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but shipping space is wasted and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging production simplicityVSAvoidshipping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging size and shape are dynamically determined through 3D scanning of the item, eliminating the need for oversized standard boxes. The additive manufacturing process then creates packaging that precisely fits the item's dimensions, maximizing shipping space utilization without complicating the manufacturing workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions into a single workflow: 3D scanning for measurement, automated design generation, and additive manufacturing for production. This universal system handles diverse item shapes and sizes through one process, achieving custom-fit efficiency without sacrificing manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If excessive packing materials are used, then product protection is improved, but material waste increases and shipping cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protectionVSAvoidpackaging material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process applies starch-based material with varying density and thickness at different locations based on the item's specific protection needs. Critical areas receive more material while less vulnerable areas receive minimal coverage, eliminating the need for uniform excessive packaging and reducing overall material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts material deposition parameters including layer thickness, infill density, and material composition based on real-time analysis of the item's geometry and vulnerability. This precise parameter control ensures adequate protection while minimizing material usage, directly addressing the contradiction between protection and waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11565837B2Apparatus for packaging an item
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 COLSON SHAY C
  • US11565837B2 patent drawing
  • US11565837B2 patent drawing
  • US11565837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and process of printing a package of expanded material (e.g., expanded starch, foam or other expanded material). The expanded material can be heated and extruded, poured, sprayed, or otherwise applied in malleable form that sets up to become a porous protective covering for an item to be packaged. In an example, a layer of expanded material is laid down, and the item in a protective covering (e.g., a plastic bag, sleeve, coating, etc.) is positioned on the layer of expanded material. Additional layers or expanded material may be applied, thereby encasing the item. The top surface of the expanded material may be flattened, such as by operation of a roller, press, or cutter. The top surface may be sprayed with a shellac sealant, paint, or other coating, to allow printing of a label on the top surface.