Expansion Joint Bridging Device with Embedded Holding Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing expansion joint bridging devices in roadways face issues with mechanical resilience, peeling under compressive or tensile stresses, and maintenance costs due to inadequate reinforcement and adhesion between the superstructure and substructure.

Innovation Solution

The device incorporates at least one holding element embedded in the superstructure, formed as an angle profile with legs reaching into the elastic element, and uses a polyurea or polyurea system for the elastic element, which is cast on-site, providing improved adhesion and mechanical stability, and a substructure made from materials like epoxy resins or metals for enhanced load-bearing capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the superstructure is directly placed on the substructure without holding elements, then the device complexity is reduced, but the mechanical resilience and adhesion between superstructure and substructure deteriorate, causing peeling under compressive or tensile stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical resilienceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holding elements are embedded within the superstructure, with their legs reaching into the elastic element. This nesting approach integrates the reinforcement function directly into the superstructure without adding external components, thereby improving mechanical resilience while minimizing increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The device combines the superstructure made of polyurea or polyurea system with holding elements made of angle profile material. This composite construction integrates materials with different properties to achieve both structural integrity and adhesion, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the contact surface between elastic element and road surface is not reinforced, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the peeling resistance under compressive or tensile stresses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeeling resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The holding elements are embedded in the superstructure during the casting process, with legs extending into the elastic element. This nested configuration reinforces the contact surface and integrates adhesion improvement directly into the manufacturing process, maintaining ease of manufacture while enhancing peeling resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If a traditional elastic element material is used, then the ease of manufacture is maintained, but the ability to withstand higher forces and maintain trafficability at high temperatures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce withstanding capacityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The elastic element is made from polyurea or polyurea system, which changes the material parameters to achieve higher strength, improved temperature resistance, and maintained trafficability. These parameter changes enable the material to withstand higher forces while maintaining ease of cast-on-site manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Duration of action of stationary object

If the expansion joint coverage is extended, then the durability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to larger and more complex structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holding elements are divided into multiple legs that reach into the elastic element at different positions. This segmentation allows the reinforcement function to be distributed throughout the expansion joint coverage area, extending durability while keeping each individual holding element relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces peeling and enhances the device's mechanical resilience, allowing it to withstand higher forces, maintain trafficability at high temperatures, and extend expansion joint coverage, thereby increasing service life and reducing maintenance and installation costs.

Implementation Method 1

The elastic element is cast on-site, produced from a castable synthetic resin or plastic, in that it consists at least partially of a polyurea or polyurea system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP2483477B2Device for bridging an expansion joint
Publication Date: 2023.01.18 MAGEBA - SH
  • EP2483477B2 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for bridging an expansion joint (2) in the region of a carriageway, said device comprising a superstructure (5) and a substructure (6), the superstructure (5) comprising at least one elastic element (15) and the substructure (6) forming a support for the superstructure (5). At least one holding element (19, 20) that is at least partially embedded in the elastic element is arranged in the superstructure (5).