Expense Analysis GUI Alerts for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual tracking of travel expenses can lead to exceeding spending limits and potential fraud, as well as inefficiencies in planning and managing trips, due to the lack of automated systems for expense management and real-time transaction tracking.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that includes a network interface, database, and processing circuit to automate expense management by receiving and processing travel data, comparing it with stored information, and providing real-time alerts and recommendations, as well as managing invoices and transactions within predetermined budgets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tracking of travel expenses is used, then simplicity of operation is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to potential fraud and exceeding spending limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense tracking reliabilityVSAvoidexpense management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically tracks expenses, compares them against budget limits, and generates alerts without requiring manual intervention. The expense management system serves itself by autonomously monitoring transactions, detecting anomalies, and notifying users, thereby improving reliability while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors expense transactions and provides real-time feedback to users through alerts and notifications. This feedback mechanism enables users to stay informed about their spending status, preventing budget overruns and potential fraud while maintaining a user-friendly interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated expense management system is implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense management reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The expense management system integrates multiple functions including transaction monitoring, budget tracking, fraud detection, and user notification into a single unified platform. This multi-functionality improves reliability across various expense management tasks while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between users and their expense data, providing a simplified interface that handles complex monitoring and analysis tasks. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of automated tracking behind a user-friendly interface, improving reliability without exposing users to system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If real-time transaction tracking is implemented, then productivity improves, but loss of time increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense management efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing budget limits, expense categories, and monitoring thresholds before transactions occur. This preparation enables real-time tracking to proceed efficiently without time-consuming analysis during the monitoring process, as the system only needs to compare transactions against pre-set criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical tracking methods with automated digital processing. By using computer-based monitoring and analysis, the system achieves real-time expense tracking with minimal time investment, as automated algorithms process transactions instantaneously without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240370940A1Systems and methods for expense analysis based graphical user interface alerts
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20240370940A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370940A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370940A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system of a provider includes a network interface, a database that can store expense information of the provider, and one or more processors and a memory structured to store instructions that are executable to cause the one or more processors to receive a request to submit an invoice for an expense reimbursement, query a camera device of a first user device to scan the invoice, receive image data of the invoice based on the scan, extract a plurality of data elements of the image data of the invoice, compare the plurality of data elements with the stored expense information of the provider, determine that at least one data element of the plurality of data elements meets an alert criteria, store the plurality of data elements of the invoice in the database, and transmit, to a second user device, a notification including an indication to review the invoice.