Expense Report Fraud Detection Using Semantic Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in detecting fraud and compliance issues in expense reports, leading to unnecessary spending on false or dishonest claims, which can be time-consuming and costly to investigate.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method using semantic analysis and machine learning algorithms to detect anomalies in expense reports by enriching data with web-scale information, verifying receipts, and identifying inappropriate expenses, thereby classifying risks and flagging potential fraud.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual investigation of expense reports is performed, then fraud detection accuracy is maintained, but time consumption and investigation costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime consumptionVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical investigation processes with automated computer-based systems that use machine learning algorithms, semantic analysis, and data processing to automatically detect fraud patterns in expense reports, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service fraud detection by automatically analyzing expense reports without requiring manual human intervention for each case, using automated algorithms to identify suspicious patterns and flag potential fraud for review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive fraud detection analysis is performed on all expense reports, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and analyzing expense report data using machine learning models to identify high-risk patterns before full investigation, allowing prioritized processing that maintains accuracy while improving overall processing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud detection process is segmented into multiple stages: initial automated screening using algorithms, intermediate risk assessment, and final detailed investigation only for high-risk cases, thereby maintaining detection accuracy while processing larger volumes of reports efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated algorithms are used to detect fraud, then processing speed is improved, but false positive rates may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results are continuously refined based on outcomes, allowing the machine learning algorithms to learn from false positives and improve detection reliability over time while maintaining high processing speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system dynamically adjusts its sensitivity and thresholds based on learned patterns and feedback, adapting its behavior to reduce false positives while maintaining high processing speed through optimized algorithmic parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11954739B2Methods and systems for automatically detecting fraud and compliance issues in expense reports and invoices
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 APPZEN
  • US11954739B2 patent drawing
  • US11954739B2 patent drawing
  • US11954739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect a computerized method for detecting anomalies in expense reports of an enterprise includes the step of implementing a semantic analysis algorithm on an expense report data submitted by an employee, wherein the expense report data is provided in a computer-readable format. The method includes the step of, with one or more machine learning algorithms, detecting an anomaly in expense report data. The method includes the step of obtaining an augmentation of the expense report data with a set of web scale data. The method includes the step of verifying receipts associated with an expense report. The method includes the step of determining that the employee or any employee has previously claimed an expense in the expense report data. The method includes the step of identifying an inappropriate expense in the expense report data.