Expense Management System Automated Mapping and Auditing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current expense reporting systems face challenges in accurately categorizing and auditing expense data from multiple vendors, leading to inefficiencies and potential fraud, as they often rely on manual entry and lack robust mapping and auditing capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An expense management system that imports trusted itemized data, maps it to defined expense types using a customizable mapping program, and includes an audit program to ensure accuracy and prevent fraud, featuring storage units for company-specific data, a user interface for multiple user types, and an audit module for flagging and approving changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual entry and categorization of expense data is used, then flexibility in handling various expense types is maintained, but accuracy and efficiency deteriorate due to manual errors and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense reporting efficiencyVSAvoidexpense categorization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical entry and categorization processes with an automated computer system that uses mapping programs to automatically categorize expenses based on predefined rules and patterns, eliminating manual errors and improving both efficiency and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the mapping program automatically processes expense data without requiring manual intervention for each entry, allowing the system to self-categorize and audit expenses based on stored patterns and company policies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated mapping programs are implemented, then productivity and consistency improve, but device complexity increases due to need for customizable mapping rules and multiple data formats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense processing speedVSAvoidmapping program complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mapping program is segmented into multiple rule sets and pattern recognition modules that can be independently configured and applied to different expense types, allowing complex mapping logic to be broken down into manageable segments that ease the configuration process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows parameter changes in mapping rules and thresholds that can be customized according to different companies' policies and expense types, enabling flexibility without requiring complete system redesign when requirements change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If robust auditing capabilities are added, then reliability and fraud detection improve, but device complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense data accuracyVSAvoidaudit program complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The audit program incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically review mapped expenses against predefined rules and company policies, providing real-time validation and flagging potential errors or fraudulent activities for further review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary auditing actions by automatically reviewing and validating expense data before it is finalized, preventing errors and fraud from propagating through the system while maintaining a streamlined audit process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If customizable filtering and tolerances are implemented, then adaptability to various company policies improves, but device complexity increases due to need for multiple configuration options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy customization capabilityVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mapping and auditing parameters are made dynamic and configurable, allowing the system to adapt its behavior based on different company policies and expense types without requiring complete system reconfiguration, enabling flexibility through parameter adjustment rather than structural changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7974892B2System and method for expense management
Publication Date: 2011.07.05 CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US7974892B2 patent drawing
  • US7974892B2 patent drawing
  • US7974892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for expense management. An expense data record is retrieved from a trusted source and two or more sub-transactions are identified. The expense data record is then added to an expense report as two or more expense items corresponding to the two or more sub-transactions.