Expense Receipt Validation via Device Trajectory Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current expense reimbursement systems face inefficiencies in validating business expenses due to the manual effort required to determine the validity of receipts, with existing solutions like pre-approval and reimbursement caps being either time-consuming or complex to implement.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize trajectory information from employee devices to compare with receipt data, determining validity by matching device and receipt trajectory information, thereby automating the validation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual determination is used to validate receipts, then validation accuracy can be maintained, but the effort and time required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical validation process with an automated electronic system that uses trajectory data from GPS devices to validate receipts. The system automatically compares device trajectories with receipt information to determine validity, eliminating the need for manual review while maintaining validation accuracy through objective data comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-validation by automatically comparing trajectory data with receipt information without requiring human intervention. The validation process serves itself by using pre-collected trajectory data from employee devices to automatically determine receipt validity, reducing the need for manual effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If pre-approval mechanism is implemented, then expense validity can be ensured, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpense validityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by collecting and storing trajectory data from employee devices before expense validation is needed. This pre-collected data is then automatically compared with receipt information during validation, ensuring expense validity without requiring a complex pre-approval process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The complex manual pre-approval process is replaced with an automated electronic system that uses trajectory data comparison. The system automatically validates expenses by comparing device trajectories with receipt information, maintaining reliability while significantly reducing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If reimbursement caps are set, then invalid claims can be limited, but the system becomes complex to implement and manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvalid claimsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex reimbursement cap system with automated trajectory-based validation. Instead of using monetary caps to limit invalid claims, the system uses objective trajectory data comparison to automatically identify and reject invalid receipts, reducing system complexity while effectively limiting invalid claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated validation system is implemented, then manual effort is reduced, but the system requires complex trajectory matching mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation efficiencyVSAvoidtrajectory matching complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-collecting and storing trajectory data from employee devices before validation is needed. This preparation work is done in advance, so that during validation, the system only needs to perform simple comparison operations with pre-processed receipt information, reducing the complexity of the matching process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process is segmented into distinct components: trajectory data collection, receipt information processing, and comparison operations. By dividing the validation process into these manageable segments, the system achieves high productivity while keeping each component's complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10510125B2Expense compliance checking based on trajectory detection
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10510125B2 patent drawing
  • US10510125B2 patent drawing
  • US10510125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer program storage product determine determining a trajectory information type of a receipt submitted by an employee. Trajectory information associated with the receipt submitted by the employee is retrieved based on the trajectory information type. Trajectory information corresponding to a device associated with the employee is also retrieved. The receipt is determined as a valid receipt in response to the trajectory information associated with the receipt submitted by the employee matching the trajectory information associated with the device associated with the employee.