Experience Matrix Blueprint for Talent Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current human resource management systems lack an effective framework for capturing and utilizing high-quality experience information, leading to superficial career planning, development, and talent management, resulting in inadequate guidance for employees and underutilization of talent within organizations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and software tool that utilizes a two-dimensional matrix blueprint to organize and prioritize job-related experiences, creating personal experience profiles for individuals and comparing them to job blueprints to generate succession plans and development strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional human resource management systems are used to handle experience information, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but the quality and effectiveness of career planning and talent management deteriorates due to superficial handling of experience data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of career planningVSAvoidcomplexity of experience management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments experience information into structured components using a two-dimensional matrix blueprint with specific experiences as rows and proficiency levels as columns. This segmentation transforms unstructured experience data into organized, analyzable units that can be systematically captured and evaluated, directly improving the reliability of career planning while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular data organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces specific parameters including experience proficiency levels (novice, intermediate, advanced, expert), career stage classifications, and experience categories. These parameter changes transform qualitative experience descriptions into quantifiable data points that can be objectively measured and compared, enhancing the quality of talent management decisions without requiring overly complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If comprehensive experience information is captured and integrated into personnel development processes, then the effectiveness of talent management improves, but the complexity of capturing and managing this information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of talent managementVSAvoidcomplexity of experience capture process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal experience matrix blueprint that serves multiple functions simultaneously: capturing current experience levels, identifying development gaps, planning career paths, and assessing readiness for specific positions. This multi-functional tool consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate processes into a single unified system, improving talent management effectiveness while controlling complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes experience blueprints and proficiency level frameworks in advance before actual talent management activities occur. These pre-defined structures provide ready-to-use templates for capturing and analyzing experience information, eliminating the need to create evaluation frameworks from scratch for each talent management task and thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If experience information is used to guide career planning and succession planning, then employee development and organizational performance improve, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring experience quality increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of succession planningVSAvoiddifficulty of measuring experience quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by defining specific proficiency levels (novice, intermediate, advanced, expert) for each experience category rather than using uniform evaluation criteria. This allows the measurement system to adapt to the specific requirements of different experience types and career stages, improving the accuracy of succession planning by capturing nuanced differences in experience quality that generic measures would miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces subjective, mechanical judgment of experience quality with a structured classification system based on defined proficiency levels and experience categories. This substitution transforms the difficult task of qualitatively assessing experience into a more objective process of categorizing and comparing standardized data points, thereby improving succession planning accuracy while reducing measurement difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If individuals are placed in positions based on detailed experience analysis, then the match between individual strengths and position requirements improves, but the time and resources required for assessment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of job-personnel matchVSAvoidtime for experience assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses experience blueprints as reusable templates that can be copied and applied across multiple assessment scenarios. Once a blueprint is created for a particular position or career stage, it can be replicated and used repeatedly for evaluating different individuals, significantly reducing the time and resources required for each assessment while maintaining consistent, high-quality matching criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining experience blueprints, proficiency levels, and evaluation criteria before actual placement decisions are made. This advance preparation creates ready-to-use assessment frameworks that streamline the evaluation process, allowing rapid comparison of individual experience profiles against predetermined standards without requiring time-consuming ad hoc analysis for each placement decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7912790B2Tool and method for personnel development and talent management based on experience
Publication Date: 2011.03.22 ALBERTSSON CANDICE K
  • US7912790B2 patent drawing
  • US7912790B2 patent drawing
  • US7912790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method for managing experience information includes: defining an overall blueprint representing a collection of experiences in a two-dimensional matrix having a plurality of entries organized into a plurality of rows and columns such that each entry in the matrix corresponds to one experience in the collection; defining a plurality of specific blueprints each modeled after the overall blueprint such that each specific blueprint represents the collection of experiences in the two-dimensional matrix and indicates a relative priority of each experience in the collection for the particular specific blueprint; obtaining experience information for a plurality of individuals using the overall blueprint, the experience information obtained for each individual defining a personal experience profile for that individual and indicating which experiences in the collection the individual possesses; and, storing the personal experience profile for each individual, each stored personal experience profile including the obtained experience information defining the personal experience profile for that individual.