Expert Diversification via Bidding Mechanism in Ensemble Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional ensemble diversification methods are ineffective in achieving proper diversification during the learning process, leading to inaccurate decision-making by machine learning experts, as they fail to control and optimize the expertise of individual learners effectively.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution introduces a bidding mechanism that dynamically allocates training data and adjusts bidding currency to encourage experts to specialize in sub-domains where they excel, while discouraging them from areas of low confidence, creating a positive feedback loop for expertise growth and ensuring diverse decision-making capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional ensemble diversification methods are used to train multiple experts, then the system can generate diverse decisions from different experts, but the individual experts fail to develop specialized expertise in specific sub-domains, leading to inaccurate decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpert specializationVSAvoiddecision accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process by introducing a bidding mechanism that allocates training samples to specific experts based on their performance in different sub-domains. Each expert competes for training samples by bidding, and the system segments the training data distribution according to expert performance, allowing experts to specialize in specific sub-domains rather than training all experts uniformly on all data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of training data allocation from uniform distribution to performance-based distribution. By introducing bidding currency and performance-based allocation, the system dynamically adjusts which experts receive which training samples based on their current performance metrics, enabling specialization while maintaining overall diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If training data is distributed uniformly to all experts, then all experts can be trained, but resource imbalance occurs where some experts dominate training resources while others underperform, preventing effective diversification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidexpert diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where expert performance is continuously evaluated and used to adjust training resource allocation. The bidding currency system provides feedback to experts about their performance, and the system uses this feedback to dynamically reallocate training samples, ensuring that resources flow to experts who can best utilize them while maintaining diversity through performance-based competition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the training resource allocation dynamic rather than static. Experts' bidding currency and training sample allocation change dynamically based on their performance in different rounds of training. This dynamic allocation allows the system to adapt to changing expert capabilities and maintain both efficiency and diversity throughout the training process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If experts are allowed to learn freely without control mechanisms, then learning flexibility is maintained, but the ensemble fails to achieve proper diversification and experts make similar decisions, reducing ensemble effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning flexibilityVSAvoidensemble diversification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary bidding mechanism that mediates between expert learning flexibility and ensemble diversification requirements. The bidding system acts as an intermediary layer that allows experts to compete for training resources based on their needs and performance, while the system controller ensures that diversification goals are met by managing the overall allocation and preventing any single expert from dominating all training samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12141237B2System and method for ensemble expert diversification via bidding and control thereof
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US12141237B2 patent drawing
  • US12141237B2 patent drawing
  • US12141237B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teaching relates to method, system, medium, and implementations for machine learning. A bid is received, from an expert during training, for a training sample with an amount within a level of available bidding currency associated with the expert. The training sample is used for training a model associated with the expert. It is determined whether the expert is among at least one winner selected based on bids from one or more experts. If the expert is among the at least one winner, the training sample is sent to the expert. The at least one winner is selected based on one or more criteria aiming at expert diversification.