Real-time Expert Matching System for Dynamic Skill Gaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in efficiently recruiting and retaining suitable experts and providing relevant training due to dynamic job requirements, lack of real-time adaptation, and consideration of factors like GDPR regulations, location, and expertise availability in existing solutions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented recommendation system that performs real-time matching and optimization of experts and training based on dynamic job requirements, leveraging machine learning to identify learning gaps and provide personalized recommendations, adapting to changes in job needs, and supporting GDPR compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional internal recruitment mechanisms or commercial vendor services are used for expert searches, then expert recruitment can be performed, but the process is slow, lacks real-time adaptation to dynamic job requirements, and cannot provide personalized recommendations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpert recruitment efficiencyVSAvoidtime to identify and recruit suitable experts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual or mechanical recruitment processes with an automated machine learning-based recommendation system. The system uses algorithms to automatically analyze job requirements, scan expert profiles, identify learning gaps, and generate personalized recommendations, substituting the slow mechanical processes of traditional recruitment with intelligent automated processing that operates in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service functionality where the recommendation engine autonomously performs expert identification, profile matching, and recommendation generation without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning models continuously learn from organizational data and automatically adapt to changing job requirements, making the system self-improving and reducing dependency on external vendors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If organizations invest in training to develop internal expertise, then expert capabilities can be built, but it is difficult to predict what topics personnel should invest in with ongoing training due to dynamically changing expertise needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment of training with dynamic organizational needsVSAvoiduncertainty about future expertise requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where the recommendation system monitors organizational goals, project requirements, and performance data to dynamically identify skill gaps. The machine learning models process this feedback in real-time and generate updated training recommendations, creating a closed-loop system that continuously adapts training investments to changing organizational needs rather than relying on static training plans

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of emerging trends, upcoming projects, and strategic goals to predict future expertise requirements before they become critical needs. By proactively identifying skill gaps and recommending training in advance, the organization can prepare expertise pipelines ahead of time rather than reacting to shortages when they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If a recommendation system uses machine learning to perform real-time matching, then personalized and adaptive expert recommendations can be generated, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of expert recommendationsVSAvoidcomplexity of recommendation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recommendation system into distinct functional modules: job requirement analysis, expert profile scanning, learning gap identification, recommendation generation, and performance tracking. Each module handles a specific aspect of the recommendation process independently, allowing the complex system to be managed through modular components that can be developed, tested, and maintained separately while working together to provide personalized recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11443256B2Real-time matching and smart recommendations for tasks and experts
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 SAP SE
  • US11443256B2 patent drawing
  • US11443256B2 patent drawing
  • US11443256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

User information for a particular user is accessed. Expert information for experts and training that is available in an organization of the particular user is accessed. One or more pattern matches between the user information and the expert information are determined. One or more expert recommendations are generated based on the one or more pattern matches and provided.