Expert Reliability Scaling for Adaptive Decision Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decision-making techniques fail to adapt appropriately to changes in the environment by adding or removing experts, as seen in the elevator traffic demand prediction apparatus.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that sets, normalizes, and scales the reliability of multiple experts using a setting process, a first calculation process, and a second calculation process to handle additions and removals of experts effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of experts is increased to improve prediction accuracy, then the prediction performance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of expert reliability from fixed to dynamic by introducing normalization and scaling processes. The reliability of each expert is adjusted based on their performance (loss value) and the total number of experts, allowing the system to adaptively optimize prediction accuracy without manually increasing the number of experts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the reliability weighting is adjusted to improve decision quality, then the decision making accuracy is improved, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision making accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the reliability parameter through normalization (dividing by sum of all reliabilities) and scaling (multiplying by total number of experts). This systematic parameter transformation improves decision quality while keeping the calculation process structured and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by updating expert reliabilities based on loss values obtained from prediction results. Experts with lower loss values (better performance) receive higher reliability weights in subsequent predictions, creating a continuous improvement loop that enhances decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250348767A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 NEC CORP
  • US20250348767A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348767A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348767A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes at least one processor that carries out: a setting process of setting a reliability for an expert; a first calculation process of normalizing the reliability to calculate a normalized reliability; an updating process of updating the normalized reliability with reference to a loss value; and a second calculation process of subjecting the updated normalized reliability to scaling. In the setting process, as a reliability of a new expert, the at least one processor sets a predetermined value, and as a reliability of an existing expert, the at least one processor set the scaled reliability.