Expert Rule-Based Reasoning for HVAC Control Fault Diagnostics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

HVAC systems in commercial settings often experience faults such as oscillations in control loops, frequent ON/OFF switching, and permanent setpoint offsets, leading to energy waste, equipment wear, and discomfort, which existing automated fault detection and diagnosis methods struggle to accurately and reliably diagnose due to limitations in data interpretation and stability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of expert rules and reasoning rules applied to controller performance indicators and raw data, using a fuzzy logic approach to compute symptoms and map them to faults, providing a more reliable and stable diagnostic output with reduced false alarms and improved user understanding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing automated fault detection methods are used, then fault detection capability is provided, but diagnostic reliability and stability deteriorate due to false alarms and inaccurate data interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoiddata interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an expert rule-based reasoning system as an intermediary layer between raw sensor data and fault diagnosis conclusions. This reasoning engine applies domain knowledge rules to interpret controller performance indicators, reducing false alarms and improving diagnostic reliability by mediating the interpretation process rather than relying on direct threshold-based detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where diagnostic results and performance indicators are continuously monitored and fed back into the reasoning engine. This allows the system to learn from past diagnoses, adjust its reasoning patterns, and improve accuracy over time by incorporating feedback loops in the diagnostic process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If complex diagnostic algorithms are implemented, then diagnostic capability is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic system into distinct modular components: data acquisition module, controller performance indicator calculation module, expert rule reasoning engine, and diagnosis output module. Each module performs a specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable, maintainable, and easier to implement without requiring a monolithic complex algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The expert rule-based reasoning engine operates autonomously using pre-defined rules and logic that automatically process performance indicators and generate diagnoses without requiring complex external computational resources or manual intervention. The system serves itself by applying embedded domain knowledge rules to interpret data and identify faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If more monitoring indicators are collected, then diagnostic information completeness is improved, but data processing complexity and false alarm rate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on the most critical controller performance indicators that are directly relevant to control-related faults, rather than processing all available sensor data. By selecting and extracting only the essential indicators (such as setpoint tracking errors, actuator position deviations, and control loop stability metrics), the system reduces data processing complexity while maintaining diagnostic completeness for control faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The expert rule-based reasoning engine applies different interpretation rules and thresholds tailored to specific types of control-related faults. Instead of using uniform processing for all data, the system applies localized quality assessment - different reasoning patterns for oscillations, frequent ON/OFF switching, setpoint offsets, and other specific control issues - thereby improving reliability by matching data interpretation to the specific fault context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10852019B2Application of reasoning rules for fault diagnostics of control-related faults
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10852019B2 patent drawing
  • US10852019B2 patent drawing
  • US10852019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system controls and monitors a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. The system receives raw data from HVAC equipment, controller performance monitoring (CPM) indicators associated with the HVAC equipment, and a set of rules associated with the HVAC equipment. The system processes the CPM indicators and the raw data using the set of rules to generate fault relevancies, and processes the fault relevancies.