Expert Search Thread Invitation Engine for Guided Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search algorithms rely on the 'wisdom of the masses' by ranking websites based on traffic, often resulting in thousands of irrelevant search results without guidance on navigating the topic or optimal order, failing to provide relevant expert insights.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a 'wisdom of the experts' approach by identifying and showcasing expert search threads authored by knowledgeable individuals, who curate and annotate relevant links, comments, and guidelines, to enhance search result navigation and credibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search algorithms rank websites based on user traffic data, then the quantity of search results is large, but the relevancy of search results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of search resultsVSAvoidrelevancy of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces expert users as intermediaries between the search query and search results. These experts curate and annotate search results, adding credibility and relevance information. The expert search thread acts as a mediator that filters and organizes the large volume of search results, allowing users to access relevant information without being overwhelmed by irrelevant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the ranking parameter from pure traffic-based metrics to a hybrid system that incorporates expert annotations and credibility scores. By modifying the parameters used to rank search results (adding expert validation, relevance scores, and credibility metrics), the system maintains large result sets while improving their overall relevancy through multi-dimensional evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If search algorithms provide vast amounts of search data, then the completeness of information is improved, but the ease of navigation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of informationVSAvoidease of navigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large body of search results into expert-curated threads organized by topic and relevance. Each expert search thread divides the comprehensive information into manageable, logically organized segments with clear headings, annotations, and hierarchical structure. This segmentation allows users to navigate complete information sets without being overwhelmed, as experts have already performed the cognitive work of organizing and prioritizing content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Expert users serve as intermediaries who organize and structure comprehensive search results into navigable formats. The expert search thread acts as a mediating layer that transforms raw, overwhelming search data into structured, easy-to-navigate content with clear organization, making comprehensive information accessible without requiring users to manually sort through vast amounts of unorganized data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If expert search threads are created to improve relevancy, then the quality of search results is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of search resultsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where expert users voluntarily create and maintain search threads without requiring complex automated curation systems. The platform provides simple tools for experts to annotate and organize results, leveraging human expertise rather than complex algorithms. This self-service approach improves quality through human judgment while avoiding the need for sophisticated automated filtering and ranking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The expert search thread system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it curates results, provides annotations, establishes credibility, organizes information, and enables user interaction. By creating a multi-functional platform that combines these features in a unified interface, the system improves quality without proportionally increasing complexity, as a single expert thread performs multiple valuable functions that would otherwise require separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20220405801A1Expert Search Thread Invitation Engine
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 IPAR LLC
  • US20220405801A1 patent drawing
  • US20220405801A1 patent drawing
  • US20220405801A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for providing search results. Social media posts are analyzed to identify a candidate for authoring an expert search thread, where one or more search terms are extracted from one or more social media posts of the candidate. The candidate is contacted to solicit an expert search thread, where the expert search thread solicited includes an identification of a plurality of links entered via a user interface by the expert that the expert identifies as being helpful to learning about a topic associated with the one or more search terms. The expert search thread is included in a set of search results prompted by one or more of the search terms.