Explainable OR System Using Knowledge Graphs for Model Interpretability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operations Research (OR) models are often opaque, limiting their interpretability and explainability, which leads to a lack of trust and potential biases in decision-making processes, as users and systems cannot interact with or interrogate the solutions, resulting in suboptimal or irrevocable damages.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an explainable OR system using machine learning and generative artificial intelligence to provide transparent explanations of optimization algorithms, enabling a two-way translation from entity specifics to abstract models and back, allowing users to query and understand the decision-making processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Operations Research models are used to improve decision-making processes, then optimization solutions are obtained, but the models become opaque and lack interpretability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoidmodel interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the OR model into interpretable components by creating a knowledge graph that breaks down the model's structure into discrete nodes (variables, constraints, objectives) and edges (relationships). This allows the opaque model to be divided into understandable parts while preserving the optimization functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a knowledge graph as an intermediary layer between the OR model and users. This mediator translates the internal model representations into human-readable explanations, enabling users to query and understand the model's decision-making processes without exposing the complex underlying mathematics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If OR models operate as black boxes, then computational efficiency is maintained, but user trust decreases and biases remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoiduser trust
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables feedback mechanisms where users can query the knowledge graph to understand model decisions, challenge assumptions, and provide feedback on potential biases. This feedback loop allows users to trust the model more while maintaining computational efficiency, as the knowledge graph is pre-built from the model structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-building the knowledge graph from the OR model structure before execution. This allows the model to maintain its computational efficiency during optimization while the explanatory structure is already in place, ready to answer user queries about model behavior and assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If OR models provide only end-result solutions, then implementation is simplified, but iterative improvement becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution implementationVSAvoidmodel improvement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model into modifiable components represented in the knowledge graph (variables, constraints, objectives, parameters). This segmentation allows users to easily implement solutions while also enabling iterative improvement by modifying specific segments of the model without rewriting the entire optimization formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics to the model by allowing the knowledge graph structure to be dynamically modified. Users can add new variables, constraints, or parameters to the knowledge graph to adapt the model to changing conditions, enabling iterative improvement while maintaining ease of implementation through the graphical interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240403658A1Machine learning model optimization explainability
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 C3 AI INC
  • US20240403658A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403658A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403658A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine learning model optimization explainability application is provides explanations (e.g., natural language explanations) for the operations and decisions associated with an optimization model (e.g., optimization algorithm) used to solve an optimization problem. More specifically, the software application for machine learning model optimization explainability enables explainability for a query that determine how the solution was generated. The system can provide a query response (e.g., natural language explanation), and perform a variety of different actions to address any issues surfaced in the query response.