Explosion Forming Gas-Liquid Interface for Mass Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods of explosive forming are costly and time-consuming, particularly due to the need for complex gas-tight interfaces and high gas quantities, which also result in burns on the workpiece.

Innovation Solution

The method involves positioning the gas mixture above the surface of a liquid, allowing for efficient energy transmission across the gas-liquid interface, reducing gas requirements, and using the liquid as both a pressure transmission medium and cooling agent, with controlled liquid filling and ignition outside the workpiece cavity to achieve higher pressures and prevent burns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If gas mixture is positioned above the liquid surface, then gas consumption is reduced and burning is prevented, but energy transmission efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas consumptionVSAvoidenergy transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a liquid medium as an intermediary between the gas mixture and the workpiece. The liquid receives the shock wave from the gas explosion and transmits it to the workpiece, enabling energy transmission while keeping the gas mixture separate from the workpiece surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the energy transmission process into two distinct stages: first, the gas mixture generates a shock wave that impacts the liquid surface; second, the liquid transmits this energy to the workpiece. This segmentation allows the gas to be positioned away from the workpiece while maintaining effective energy transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If liquid is used as pressure transmission medium, then burning on workpiece is prevented, but device complexity increases due to liquid filling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburning on workpieceVSAvoidliquid filling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs the workpiece cavity itself as the liquid containment chamber. The cavity is naturally filled with liquid before the gas mixture is introduced, eliminating the need for separate liquid containment structures or complex sealing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The liquid serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a pressure transmission medium, a cooling agent, and a protective barrier against burning. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional protective systems and simplifies the overall device design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stress or pressure

If gas mixture is routed through liquid, then higher explosion pressure is achieved, but gas quantity required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion pressureVSAvoidgas quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The liquid acts as a pressure-amplifying intermediary. When the gas mixture explodes within or through the liquid, the incompressible nature of the liquid concentrates and amplifies the pressure, achieving higher forming pressures without proportionally increasing gas quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and pressure parameters of the gas mixture by introducing it into the liquid medium. The liquid environment fundamentally alters the explosion dynamics, enabling higher pressure generation from the same gas quantity compared to gas-phase explosion alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the process, reduces gas consumption, prevents burns, and enhances forming pressure, making it suitable for mass production with improved forming quality and reduced tool design complexity.

Implementation Method 1

By activating two electrodes, detonating gas is generated under water, and this gas collects in the surrounding bag. By using a sparking plug or a heating wire to ignite the detonating gas produced in the bag, a pressure wave is produced in the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 2

the transmission of power or energy across the gas-liquid phase interface is sufficiently good in order to produce a good forming result

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 3

The liquid located in the intake area can consequently serve not only as a pressure transmission medium, but also as a cooling agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentUS8875553B2Method and mould arrangement for explosion forming
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8875553B2 patent drawing
  • US8875553B2 patent drawing
  • US8875553B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is intended to improve a tool arrangement and method for explosive forming of a workpiece by means of gas explosion, in which the workpiece is arranged in a intake area of a molding tool, wherein the intake area is at least partially filled with liquid and the explosion is triggered by means of ignition of an explosive gas mixture, to the effect that the tool arrangement and the method are suitable and simplified for mass production. This object is solved by means of a tool arrangement and a method for explosive forming of a workpiece by means of gas explosion, in which the workpiece is arranged in a intake area of a molding tool, wherein the intake area is at least partially filled with liquid and the explosion is triggered by means of ignition of an explosive gas mixture, in which the explosive gas mixture is provided at least partially above the surface of the liquid before the ignition.