Explosion-Proof Air Heater With Dry Heat Exchanger Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing explosion proof forced air electric heaters have inefficiencies in heat transfer and lack controllability, relying on liquid-filled heat exchangers and mechanical relays, which lead to premature shutdowns and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

A liquid-free dry heat exchanger with electronically controlled heating elements and an air mover, using high heat conductive metal tubes and fins, and an electronic control circuit for precise temperature monitoring and safety mechanisms to ensure efficient heat transfer and prevent overheating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a liquid-filled heat exchanger is used, then heat transfer is achieved through phase change, but the system complexity and risk of premature shutdown increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheater operation continuityVSAvoidheat exchanger structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the liquid fill (glycol mixture) from the heat exchanger system, extracting the problematic phase change mechanism while retaining the essential heat transfer function through direct electrical heating of the metal tube fins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/thermal phase change system (liquid heating, boiling, steam rising, condensation) with a direct electrical heating system where electrical elements heat the metal tubes and fins directly, eliminating the complex phase change cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If mechanical relays are used to control heating elements and air mover, then the control system is simple, but the controllability and precision are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcontrol circuit system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical relays with electronic control circuits that use solid state relays and microprocessors to control the heating elements and air mover, enabling precise temperature monitoring and control while reducing mechanical wear and improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through temperature sensors that continuously monitor the heat exchanger temperature and send signals to the electronic control circuit, which adjusts the heating elements and air mover operation to maintain optimal temperature and prevent premature shutdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If electrical heating elements and air mover are engaged simultaneously, then the control system is simple, but the air mover may be damaged before fins are sufficiently heated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair mover longevityVSAvoidstartup control sequence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a startup sequence where the electronic control circuit first activates only the electrical heating elements to heat the metal fins to sufficient temperature before engaging the air mover, preventing damage from premature operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic monitoring of fin temperature through temperature sensors that continuously check whether the fins have reached sufficient temperature before allowing air mover engagement, creating a time-based control sequence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances heat transfer efficiency by eliminating intermediate phases and provides improved controllability through electronic control, reducing premature shutdowns and simplifying installation with integrated safety features.

Implementation Method 1

The electricity is converted into heat, thereby increasing the temperature of the glycol water mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

The heat is then conducted to the steel tubes and transferred to the roll formed aluminum fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

an air mover forces cool air over the fins to distribute the heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS8755678B2Explosion proof forced air electric heater
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 DYKMAN ARJAN
  • US8755678B2 patent drawing
  • US8755678B2 patent drawing
  • US8755678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An explosion proof forced air electric heater is designed to supply heat to hazardous areas where the atmosphere contains readily combustible gases, vapors or dust particles. The heater employs an air mover which forces air through a metal heat sink with strategically placed electric heating elements. The terminal ends of the heating elements extend into a sealed and encapsulated explosion proof containment chamber which is connected to a centralized explosion proof enclosure. The explosion proof enclosure contains the control features and the electrical connections of the heater along with external accessories. The heating cycle is controlled via an electronic control circuit. The electronic circuit controls the process heating temperature, air mover operation, heating element operation, temperature measuring device operation, and monitors the total operation time of the heating elements while providing process failure feed back to the operator.