Explosion-Proof Inspection Data Integration for Accurate Hazard Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high-risk facilities face explosion hazards due to outdated infrastructure and lack of effective monitoring, leading to potential accidents from false information, omissions, and misjudgments, necessitating a solution for rapid and accurate explosion-proof diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A safety inspection solution that generates and manages demand target information through an identification code, integrating equipment inspection, gas measurement, dust monitoring, temperature sensing, access authority, and location specifying units to prevent false information and enable quick updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If measuring equipment is installed in a separate explosion-proof enclosure, then safety is improved, but installation cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidinstallation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an explosion-proof isolation barrier as an intermediary component that separates the measuring equipment from the hazardous environment. This barrier acts as a mediator that allows signal transmission while preventing direct contact between the non-explosion-proof equipment and explosive atmospheres, thereby maintaining safety without requiring full explosion-proof enclosures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into separate functional segments: the measuring equipment operates in a safe zone while the explosion hazard detection and response functions are isolated in a hazardous zone. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific environment, reducing overall system complexity and installation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If information is manually updated when facilities change, then accuracy is improved, but time consumption and human error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms where changes in facility conditions (such as gas concentrations, temperature, or equipment status) are automatically detected by sensors and reflected in the information database. This real-time feedback loop eliminates manual updates, ensuring information accuracy while saving time and reducing human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The information management system performs self-updates by automatically collecting data from various sensors and monitoring devices. The system serves itself by autonomously maintaining accurate records of facility conditions, hazard areas, and equipment status without requiring human intervention for data entry or updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If comprehensive inspection of all facilities is performed, then safety coverage is improved, but inspection time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial inspection actions by focusing monitoring resources on critical areas and parameters that pose the highest explosion risks. Rather than uniformly inspecting all facilities, the system prioritizes high-risk zones based on real-time hazard assessment, achieving adequate safety coverage with reduced inspection time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is designed with multi-functional capabilities that allow a single integrated platform to perform multiple inspection tasks simultaneously (gas detection, temperature monitoring, equipment status checking). This universality enables comprehensive safety coverage across diverse facility types without proportionally increasing inspection complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12468908B2Safety inspection solution for explosion proof diagnosis
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 FOEX CO LTD
  • US12468908B2 patent drawing
  • US12468908B2 patent drawing
  • US12468908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety inspection solution for an explosion-proof diagnosis generates an identification code of a demand target after receiving the demand target information and enables the supply target terminal to generate and manage the demand target information, wherein the demand target information includes equipment information received from an equipment inspection unit, an amount of gas measured from a gas inspection unit, an amount of dust measured from a dust measurement unit, a temperature measured from a temperature measurement unit, an access authority status of the demand target inspected from an access authority unit, and an estimated explosion location measured from a location specifying unit, and wherein the supply target terminal collects the received equipment information, the amount of gas, the amount of dust, the temperature, the access authority status of the demand target, and the estimated explosion location to provide the same to the demand target.