Explosive Separating Joint MDF Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional explosive separation joint systems face catastrophic failure risks due to the MDF not being tightly constrained within the joint and manifold, leading to thermal, dynamic, and inertial stresses that disrupt the detonation process, causing misalignment and reduced reliability.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates an expandable tube with a MDF positioned within a cavity defined by separable portions, where the MDF is constrained inwardly by a seating shoulder to minimize movement under extreme conditions, and an intermediary transfer booster is fixed in place to ensure axial alignment of detonating components, altering the impulse path and maintaining reliable detonation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the MDF is not tightly constrained within the joint and manifold, then the manufacturing precision requirements are reduced, but the reliability of detonation is compromised due to thermal, dynamic, and inertial stresses moving the MDF end out of alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precision of MDFVSAvoiddetonation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary transfer booster is introduced between the initiating ordnance and the MDF booster. This transfer booster serves as a mediator that receives the detonation impulse from the initiating ordnance and reliably transmits it to the MDF booster, even when the MDF is not tightly constrained. The transfer booster compensates for potential misalignment and maintains the detonation train integrity under thermal, dynamic, and inertial stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows the MDF to have some movement capability rather than being rigidly fixed, while the transfer booster is fixed in place to maintain axial alignment. This dynamic approach accommodates thermal expansion and inertial forces during launch, preventing the MDF from being constrained in a way that would compromise reliability under extreme conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the MDF is tightly constrained to maintain alignment, then detonation reliability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetonation reliabilityVSAvoidjoint and manifold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer booster acts as a fixed intermediary element that simplifies the overall system by providing a stable reference point for detonation alignment. Rather than requiring the entire MDF assembly to be tightly constrained, only the transfer booster needs to be fixed in place, reducing the complexity of constraints required on movable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the initiating ordnance is positioned perpendicular to the MDF end and booster, then the device complexity is reduced, but the MDF may move out of the critical operation zone causing detonation failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanifold design complexityVSAvoidseparation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer booster positioned at a right angle between the initiating ordnance and MDF booster serves as a critical intermediary that bridges the perpendicular arrangement. It receives the detonation impulse from the initiating ordnance and transmits it to the MDF booster, ensuring reliable detonation despite the perpendicular positioning that would otherwise cause misalignment issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces manufacturing precision and costs while ensuring reliable detonation and separation of joint portions by accommodating MDF movement within the detonation range, minimizing the risk of failure under launch conditions.

Implementation Method 1

upon detonation of the MDF by the initiating ordnance the steel tube expands to a circular cross sectional configuration that ruptures or causes disengagement of separable portions of the joint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosion: Explosion

Implementation Method 2

provides a detonation impulse train where each detonating component is axially aligned within a passageway with the next detonating component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Data Source

PatentUS10739120B2Explosive separating joint
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US10739120B2 patent drawing
  • US10739120B2 patent drawing
  • US10739120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An explosive separation joint system having an expandable tube containing a mild detonating fuse (MDF) in separable portions of the joint. The MDF extends into a detonation manifold at a first port, an end of the MDF having booster bonded thereto. An external initiating ordnance transfer line enters the manifold at an initiating ordnance (IO) port, has an IO end tip and provides a detonation impulse train where each detonating component is axially aligned within a passageway with the next detonating component. In embodiments, particular detonating components of the detonation train are fixed in place where other detonating components are movable. Each detonating component that is not in direct contact with a preceding detonating component in the detonation train is in direct linear access.