Exponential Active Anti-Islanding Technique for Faster Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anti-islanding techniques, particularly active methods like Sandia Voltage Shift (SVS), face challenges with large Non-Detection Zones (NDZ) and power quality issues at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC), requiring improvements in detection speed and effectiveness while maintaining waveform integrity.

Innovation Solution

The Exponential Active Anti-Islanding Technique (EA2T) modifies the linear positive feedback of SVS with an exponential-product adjustment, using a sign, exponential, and absolute function to calculate an adaptive gain that reduces disturbances and enhances islanding detection time, ensuring a maximal Total Harmonic Distortion Index (THDi) within permitted standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active anti-islanding techniques like Sandia Voltage Shift (SVS) are used, then islanding detection capability is improved, but power quality at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) deteriorates due to waveform disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveislanding detection capabilityVSAvoidpower quality deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the feedback gain adaptive rather than constant. The gain adjusts dynamically based on operating conditions, allowing the system to maintain effective islanding detection while minimizing power quality disturbances. The adaptive mechanism enables the controller to optimize its response characteristics in real-time, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and power quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of feedback gain from a fixed value to an adaptive variable that responds to system conditions. By modifying the gain parameter dynamically, the system achieves both reliable islanding detection and acceptable power quality performance. This parameter change allows the controller to balance detection sensitivity with disturbance minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If constant gain is used in SVS method, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but detection speed and effectiveness are limited due to large Non-Detection Zones (NDZ)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static constant gain to a dynamic adaptive gain that adjusts based on system operating conditions. This dynamic approach reduces the Non-Detection Zone and accelerates detection speed while maintaining implementation feasibility. The adaptive mechanism automatically optimizes detection performance without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using system response information to adjust the feedback gain adaptively. This closed-loop approach enables the system to learn from its performance and optimize detection speed automatically. The feedback mechanism reduces the Non-Detection Zone by continuously adjusting the gain to maintain optimal detection conditions across varying operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If exponential-product adjustment is applied to reduce Non-Detection Zone, then detection effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback to implement the exponential-product adjustment adaptively. By incorporating system response information into the gain adjustment mechanism, the patent achieves reduced Non-Detection Zone without requiring overly complex control logic. The feedback-driven approach allows the system to automatically optimize detection effectiveness while managing complexity through intelligent control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the control system to automatically adjust its own parameters based on operating conditions. The adaptive gain mechanism serves itself by using system performance feedback to optimize its behavior, reducing the need for external configuration or complex control architecture. This self-adjusting capability improves detection effectiveness while keeping the system relatively simple to implement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11469597B1Exponential active anti-islanding method and device
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 INST POTOSINO DE INVESTIGACION CIENTIFICA Y TECHCA A C
  • US11469597B1 patent drawing
  • US11469597B1 patent drawing
  • US11469597B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and method based on an active anti-islanding technique for Distributed Power Generator Systems. The present invention is based on the Sandia Voltage Shift (SVS) technique, which includes a small Non-Detection Zone (NDZ) and by an acceptable solution to the tradeoff between the output power quality and the effectiveness of islanding detection. The present invention has the advantage to improve the NDZ and to reduce the anti-islanding detection times. This is due to the exponential-product modification made in the positive feedback to inject current, thereby making the response faster than SVS. Additionally, a self-adaptive gain is considered to achieve a low Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) at different power levels.