Exponential Survival Curve Modeling for Cancer Risk Group Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing survival curve models fail to accurately separate patient groups based on their risk profiles, particularly in clinical trials for cancer treatment, due to violations of the proportional hazard assumption and the failure to consider early progression and death separately.

Innovation Solution

A survival curve generating system using multiple exponential functions to model patient data, calculate relative ratios, and classify patients into groups based on intensity and restricted mean time lost (RMLT) to accurately evaluate treatment effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single exponential function is used to model survival curves, then the model is simple and easy to implement, but it cannot accurately separate patient groups with different risk profiles and violates the proportional hazard assumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidpatient group separation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the survival curve model into multiple exponential functions, each representing different patient subgroups with distinct risk profiles. This segmentation allows the model to capture heterogeneous progression patterns (rapid progressors vs. slow progressors) that a single exponential function cannot represent, thereby improving patient group separation accuracy while maintaining reasonable model complexity through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple parameters (α1, α2, β1, β2) to characterize different exponential functions, allowing flexible adjustment of progression rates and risk profiles for different patient subgroups. By changing these parameters, the model can accurately fit diverse survival patterns and separate patient groups based on their specific risk characteristics, resolving the limitation of fixed single-parameter models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If traditional survival curve models are used, then the analysis is straightforward, but they fail to separately consider early progression and death, limiting treatment effectiveness evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis simplicityVSAvoidearly progression information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the survival analysis into distinct components: early progression events and death events. By using multiple exponential functions with different parameters, the model separately captures these event types, preventing loss of early progression information that would occur in aggregated traditional models, while maintaining analytical tractability through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intensity as an intermediary parameter derived from the ratio of exponential function components. This intensity metric serves as a mediator that quantifies the relative contribution of different progression patterns, enabling separate consideration of early progression and death while maintaining a unified analytical framework that preserves information without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If restricted mean survival time (RMST) is used to overcome proportional hazard model violations, then some robustness is achieved, but limitations remain in evaluating treatment or biomarker effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel robustnessVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness evaluation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves beyond RMST by introducing multiple parameters (α1, α2, β1, β2) that characterize different exponential decay patterns. These parameters enable precise quantification of treatment effects on specific patient subgroups, improving measurement precision for treatment effectiveness evaluation while maintaining robustness through the flexible multi-parameter framework that adapts to different survival patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic intensity measures that vary over time and across patient groups, rather than relying on static RMST summaries. This dynamic approach allows the model to capture changing treatment effects and risk profiles over the survival trajectory, improving precision in evaluating treatment effectiveness while maintaining robustness through the underlying exponential function structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260031201A1Survival curve generating system using exponential function and method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 AJOU UNIV IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND
  • US20260031201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031201A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a survival curve generating system using an exponential function and a method thereof. According to the present invention, a survival curve generating system includes a data collection unit that collects data obtained from a clinical trial for cancer, a survival curve construction unit that generates a survival curve by using a survival curve model including multiple exponential functions based on the collected data, and an analysis unit that calculates a relative ratio of one exponential function included in the survival curve model, obtains intensity from a sigmoid curve derived using the relative ratio, and separates a patient group based on the intensity.