Exposed Node Latency Reduction via rTWT Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In Wi-Fi networks, especially in complex environments like large buildings or campuses, some stations (STAs) experience high latency due to being in an 'exposed node' situation, where their Network Allocation Vector (NAV) is frequently set, leading to poor channel access and increased contention periods, which existing technologies fail to adequately address.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a prioritized channel access mechanism using a Defer Signal, where STAs in an exposed node situation can request a protected period by sending a request frame to their associated Access Point (AP), which then coordinates with neighboring APs to establish a Restricted Target Wake Time (rTWT) to prevent NAV settings, allowing the STA to access the channel without interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If STAs use standard channel access mechanisms in exposed node situations, then network coverage is maintained, but latency increases due to frequent NAV settings and poor channel access

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidchannel access reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by having the AP send a CTS-to-self frame before the STA's scheduled transmission time. This preemptive CTS frame sets the NAV at neighboring STAs before they can attempt channel access, preventing the exposed node problem from occurring in the first place. The CTS-to-self frame is transmitted at a time that ensures neighboring STAs receive it and set their NAV accordingly, eliminating future contention issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing rTWT sessions in advance with predetermined transmission opportunities. The AP and STA negotiate and schedule future transmission slots before actual data transfer occurs. This advance scheduling allows the STA to know exactly when it can access the channel without contention, eliminating latency caused by repeated NAV checks and contention periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If STAs contend for channel access in exposed node situations, then channel utilization is maintained, but throughput decreases due to increased contention periods

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidchannel access opportunities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by pre-scheduling transmission opportunities through rTWT sessions. The AP and STA establish future transmission slots in advance, ensuring the STA has guaranteed channel access at specific times without needing to contend. This eliminates wasted channel access opportunities caused by NAV settings and contention delays, directly improving throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the AP monitors STA transmission needs and adjusts CTS-to-self frame timing and rTWT session parameters accordingly. The AP receives buffer status reports from STAs and uses this feedback to optimize channel access scheduling, ensuring that transmission opportunities are allocated efficiently based on actual traffic demands rather than fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If CTS-to-self frames are sent at regular intervals, then NAV protection is provided, but energy consumption increases due to frequent transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNAV protection effectivenessVSAvoidAP transmission energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by sending CTS-to-self frames at optimized intervals rather than continuously. The AP determines the optimal periodicity based on STA transmission schedules and traffic patterns, sending CTS-to-self frames only when necessary to protect upcoming transmissions. This reduces energy consumption compared to continuous periodic transmissions while maintaining adequate NAV protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by dynamically adjusting CTS-to-self frame transmission timing and power levels based on network conditions. The AP modifies transmission parameters such as the interval between CTS-to-self frames and their power levels according to traffic demand and interference conditions, optimizing the balance between NAV protection effectiveness and energy consumption rather than using fixed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240129951A1Exposed node issue configurations in wireless systems
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 INTEL CORP
  • US20240129951A1 patent drawing
  • US20240129951A1 patent drawing
  • US20240129951A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus of an access point (AP) includes memory and processing circuitry configured to encode a trigger frame for transmission to a plurality of station devices (STAs) in a wireless network. A first request frame received from a STA of the plurality of STAs is decoded. The first request frame requests the AP to create a protected period for the STA when the STA is in an exposed node situation. A second request frame is encoded for transition to at least a second AP. The second request frame requests the at least second AP to establish a restricted target wake time (rTWT) for the STA. A first response frame from the at least second AP is decoded. The first response frame includes an indication of whether the rTWT is established. A second response frame is encoded for transmission to the STA. The second response frame includes the indication.