Exposure Management System for Automated Risk Data Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk management systems for businesses are limited in their ability to automatically group and manage large numbers of risk exposures, requiring manual data entry and lacking integration across different departments and subsidiaries, which hampers efficient hedging and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Innovation Solution

An exposure management system that separates exposures into multiple risks, calculates key risk figures, and manages risk life cycles by automatically transforming raw exposure data into exposure positions, allowing for seamless integration with existing systems and enabling independent analysis and hedging of each risk component.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual data entry is used to manage risk exposures, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity and accuracy deteriorate due to time-consuming manual processes and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-processing of risk exposure data by extracting, validating, and categorizing information from multiple source systems without manual intervention. The automated classification engine independently determines risk types and creates exposure positions, eliminating the need for manual data entry while reducing operational errors and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical data entry processes are replaced with automated computer-based systems that electronically extract, validate, and process risk exposure data. The system uses automated algorithms and rules to classify exposures and create positions, substituting human manual operations with digital processing mechanisms that improve efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If exposures are manually grouped and managed, then system complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to manual processing errors and lack of integration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk exposure accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically validate extracted data against predefined rules and source systems. The classification engine receives feedback from data validation processes and adjusts categorizations accordingly, ensuring accurate risk exposure measurement while maintaining system integrity through continuous verification loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal data processing framework that handles multiple risk exposure types (FX, commodity, interest rate, stock price) through a single integrated platform. The same automated extraction and classification mechanisms work across different risk categories and source systems, improving measurement precision without requiring separate manual processes for each risk type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If separate systems are used for different departments and subsidiaries, then system complexity is reduced, but loss of information increases due to lack of integration and data silos

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integration completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system acts as an intermediary layer between separate departmental and subsidiary systems, extracting data from various source systems through standardized interfaces. The classification engine serves as a mediator that consolidates information from multiple sources into unified risk exposure positions, eliminating data silos while maintaining the modular architecture of separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges data from multiple separate sources (different departments and subsidiaries) into a single integrated risk management framework. By combining extraction, validation, and classification processes into a unified automated system, the solution consolidates previously siloed information while preserving the operational independence of individual entities through standardized data interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional processing layers and integration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated processing system is segmented into distinct functional modules: data extraction subsystem, validation subsystem, classification subsystem, and position creation subsystem. Each module handles a specific processing task independently, improving productivity through automation while managing complexity through modular architecture that allows incremental implementation and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8332298B2System and method for exposure management
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 SAP SE
  • US8332298B2 patent drawing
  • US8332298B2 patent drawing
  • US8332298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon to implement a method for risk exposure management allowing an exposure record to influence one or more risk exposures. In an embodiment, an exposure record is received, at least one data element of the received exposure record being mapped to one or more subexposures. At least one of the one or more subexposures are mapped to one of one or more exposure positions, wherein each exposure position corresponds to exactly one of the one or more risk exposures.