Extendable Barrier Locking and Pressure Structure for Stable Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional barrier devices lack adjustability and fixation stability, requiring complex assembly and prone to loosening, especially when used in passages of varying widths, and often rely on four-point support systems that complicate installation.

Innovation Solution

A slidably extendable barrier with a three-point support configuration, featuring a sliding panel system, locking assembly, and pressure adjustment mechanism, allowing flexible length adjustment and secure fixation between opposing positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional barrier devices use rigid fixed-size structures, then structural stability is maintained, but adaptability to different dimensional requirements is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different dimensional requirementsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is divided into multiple sliding panels that can be independently adjusted relative to each other. Each panel can slide along the length direction to achieve different total lengths, allowing the barrier to adapt to various dimensional requirements while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier transitions from a static fixed-size structure to a dynamic adjustable structure. The sliding panels can move along the length direction and be locked at different positions, enabling the barrier to dynamically adapt its length to match different passage widths without requiring complex reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional barrier devices use elementary sliding mechanisms, then device complexity is reduced, but fixation stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation stabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism integrates multiple functions into a unified system. The locking assembly combines the locking action with the pressure application function, where the same locking structure that secures the sliding panel also activates the pressure adjustment mechanism to maintain stable fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure adjustment assembly acts as an intermediary between the locking mechanism and the sliding panels. When the locking assembly locks the panels, the pressure adjustment assembly automatically applies pressure to maintain the locked position, ensuring stable fixation without requiring overly complex locking structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If conventional barrier devices use four-point support mounting systems, then structural stability is achieved, but ease of installation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates one of the four support points, reducing the mounting system from four-point to three-point support. This simplification maintains sufficient structural stability while significantly improving ease of installation, as only three support points need to be positioned and secured between opposing surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If conventional barrier devices use simplified locking and pressure mechanisms, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability is compromised due to gradual loosening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to looseningVSAvoidlocking and pressure mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure adjustment assembly performs a preliminary action by applying pressure to the sliding panels immediately upon locking. This preliminary pressure application prevents the panels from gradually loosening over time, as the continuous pressure counteracts any tendency for the locking mechanism to relax or wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking and pressure application mechanisms operate continuously to maintain reliable fixation. The pressure adjustment assembly continuously applies pressure to the sliding panels while locked, ensuring that the barrier maintains its position without gradual loosening, rather than relying on periodic or intermittent adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12523093B2Slidably extendable barrier
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 ZHANG SHENGJUN
  • US12523093B2 patent drawing
  • US12523093B2 patent drawing
  • US12523093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a slidably extendable barrier configured to be disposed between two opposing positions, including: a first sliding panel, a second sliding panel, a locking assembly and a pressure adjustment assembly. The first sliding panel and the second sliding panel are slidable relative to each other along the length direction; The locking assembly configured to selectively lock the first sliding panel and the second sliding panel in the length direction; The pressure adjustment assembly enables the slidably extendable barrier to be fixed between the two opposing positions. Through the described structural configuration, the barrier operates in a sequence of “sliding adjustment—locking positioning—pressure application”, thereby achieving core advantages of “flexible adaptability, rapid installation, and stable reliability”. It is particularly suitable for application scenarios requiring installation convenience, environmental compatibility (non-damaging), and situational adaptability, combining functional efficiency with practical utility.