Extendable Multihull Deck Buoyancy Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multihull boats with longitudinally extending decks lack sufficient buoyancy when extended, leading to instability and water exposure, particularly in rough conditions, as prior designs either provide negligible buoyancy or slope downward, reducing stability and increasing the stress on the main deck.

Innovation Solution

A multihull boat design featuring an upper deck supported by abeam pontoons with a lower deck slidably connected through elongated guides, where amidships pontoons provide longitudinal buoyancy, maintaining deck elevation and stability even when extended, and incorporating foldable wings for increased space without compromising stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of moving object

If the lower deck is extended longitudinally without sufficient buoyancy, then deck space is increased, but the deck becomes unstable and may slope downward toward water level

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck spaceVSAvoiddeck stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies buoyancy forces as a counterweight to the weight of the extended deck structure. Amidships pontoons are positioned to provide upward buoyant force that counteracts the downward force of the extended lower deck, preventing the deck from sloping downward toward water level and maintaining its stable elevation above water surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The buoyancy support is divided into multiple segments through separate amidships pontoons positioned at different locations along the extended deck. This segmentation allows the buoyant force to be distributed along the length of the extended deck, providing localized support and preventing overall sinking or sloping of the deck structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of moving object

If the lower deck is extended without additional buoyancy, then deck space is increased, but the weight of the structure increases, reducing loading capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck spaceVSAvoidloading capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The amidships pontoons provide buoyant force that acts as a counterweight to the extended deck structure. This buoyancy support allows the deck to be extended without proportionally increasing the overall weight of the watercraft, as the pontoons displace water to provide upward force that offsets the added structural weight, thereby preserving loading capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Length of moving object

If the ramp slopes downward to water level, then the deck can be extended, but sections of the deck become exposed to water and instability increases in rough weather

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck extensionVSAvoidwater exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The buoyant force from the amidships pontoons acts as a counterweight to prevent the extended deck from sloping downward under its own weight. This maintains the deck at a stable elevation above water level, preventing water exposure and reducing the harmful effects of waves and rough weather on the deck surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The buoyancy support system maintains the extended deck at a consistent elevation above water level, creating an equipotential surface that is free from the sloping effect. This ensures the deck remains at a uniform height regardless of water conditions, providing a stable and safe surface free from water exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Stability of the object's composition

If abeam pontoons are sized larger to accommodate extended ramp, then the ramp can be supported when extended, but the cantilevering effect increases stress on the main deck structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveramp support stabilityVSAvoidstress on main deck
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The support function is segmented between the abeam pontoons (which provide lateral support) and the amidships pontoons (which provide longitudinal buoyancy). This segmentation allows the main deck structure to be relieved of the full cantilevering stress by distributing the support function to multiple independently positioned pontoons, reducing the stress concentration on the main deck structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances deck space and stability by maintaining the lower deck above water level, reducing the risk of water exposure and stress on the main deck, while maintaining the watercraft's loading capacity and maneuverability, even in rough waters.

Implementation Method 1

Longitudinal buoyancy is provided the lower deck by means of amidships pontoons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

An upper deck is supported on a bottom side by one or more abeam pontoons or a pier structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS9302740B2Extendable multihull boat
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 QUADRATOON COMPANY
  • US9302740B2 patent drawing
  • US9302740B2 patent drawing
  • US9302740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motorized or manual extendable and retractable floating device is supported longitudinally by one or more floatation devices. The flotation deck is stored and supported by tracks or rails from beneath and between an upper deck of a houseboat, pontoon boat, tritoon boat, catamaran, floating dock, pier-supported dock or other watercraft or dock. When fully extended, the floating deck will remain attached to the watercraft, and additional width may be achieved with extendable or fold out sides or wings.