Extendable Spinal Cage for Minimally Invasive Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal cages have large dimensions, necessitating large surgical sites and complicating minimally invasive procedures for spinal fusion surgeries, which can be costly and invasive for patients.

Innovation Solution

An extendable spinal cage comprising a first and second segment, where the first segment is slidable with respect to the second, allowing the cage to be elongated from a retracted state to an extended state, facilitating minimally invasive surgery by adjusting to a smaller size during implantation and providing robust support between vertebrae.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional spinal cages are used with considerable dimensions, then structural support between vertebrae is achieved, but large surgical sites are required and minimally invasive procedures are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsurgical site size
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal cage is divided into multiple segments (first segment and second segment) that can move relative to each other. This segmentation allows the cage to be compressed to a smaller size for implantation through minimally invasive approaches, then expanded in situ to provide the necessary structural support between vertebrae.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spinal cage transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one with movable segments connected by joints. The cage can change its configuration from a compressed state during implantation to an expanded state for providing structural support, adapting its dimensions to different surgical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If conventional spinal cages with fixed dimensions are implanted, then immediate structural support is provided, but adaptability to different intervertebral spaces is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidadaptability to different spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal cage incorporates movable segments that can be adjusted to different positions and orientations. This dynamic structure allows the cage to adapt to various intervertebral space dimensions and anatomical configurations while maintaining structural support functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage's dimensional parameters can be changed in situ after implantation. The movable segments allow adjustment of the cage's length, width, or orientation to match the specific requirements of different intervertebral spaces, providing both adaptability and structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8840648B2Spinal cage and implanting method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 IND TECH RES INST
  • US8840648B2 patent drawing
  • US8840648B2 patent drawing
  • US8840648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal cage is provided to be implanted in an intervertebral disc space. The spinal cage includes a first segment and a second segment movably connected with each other. The first segment is slidable with respect to the second segment, so as to elongate the spinal cage from a retracted state to an extended state.