Extended Reality Visualization for Data Center Installation Validation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The design and installation of data centers are prone to errors due to manual processes and the complexity of cable connections, which are often not detected until later stages, prolonging the installation process and causing hardware downtime.
Innovation Solution
Utilizing extended reality-based techniques to create a virtual representation (digital twin) of the data center for visualization, allowing users to simulate configurations, identify errors, and guide the placement of hardware and routing of cables, with real-time validation and correction.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual processes are used for data center design and installation, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but errors are prone to occur and detection is delayed
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary validation by comparing the as-built virtual representation against the planned configuration before physical installation is completed. This advance checking detects errors early in the design phase rather than during or after installation, preventing time losses from rework and hardware downtime.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a virtual copy (digital twin) of the physical data center infrastructure. This virtual representation mirrors the physical system's configuration, allowing error detection through comparison without interfering with the actual installation process. The copy enables validation while the original is being built.
2Reliability
If virtual representation and real-time validation are implemented, then error detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a virtual copy (digital twin) of the physical data center infrastructure. This virtual representation mirrors the physical system's configuration, allowing error detection through comparison without interfering with the actual installation process. The copy enables validation while the original is being built.
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces a virtual representation as an intermediary between the physical installation process and the validation mechanism. This intermediary layer enables error detection by comparing virtual status against planned configuration, without requiring direct complex interaction between installation equipment and validation systems.
3Productivity
If manual installation processes are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but installation duration is prolonged
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary validation by comparing the as-built virtual representation against the planned configuration before physical installation is completed. This advance checking detects errors early in the design phase rather than during or after installation, preventing time losses from rework and hardware downtime.
Solution Approach 2:
The system provides feedback by detecting mismatches between the virtual as-built representation and the planned configuration. This feedback mechanism identifies errors in real-time during the installation process, allowing immediate correction rather than delayed detection that would prolong installation and cause hardware downtime.
Data Source
AI summary
In one example, a method includes outputting (302) a virtual representation of a physical component of prototyping system, receiving (304) an input indicating an installation status of the physical component, determining (306) that the installation status of the physical component does not match the virtual representation of the physical component, and outputting (308), by a processing system, an indicator to show where the installation status fails to match the virtual representation.


