Extension Table Locking Mechanism to Prevent Leaf Lifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing extension tables lack a robust and user-friendly mechanism to prevent extension leaves from lifting upwards, especially when multiple leaves are used, compromising structural integrity and safety.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism comprising a first locking part fixed to the extension rail and a second part fixed to the extension leaf, where the first part is lockable to the second part to prevent the leaf from being lifted, utilizing a tab-and-tab design with knurled surfaces for secure engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If extension leaves are added to adjust table dimension, then table flexibility is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates as leaves may fold against each other

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetable flexibilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into two separate parts: a first locking part attached to the extension rail and a second locking part attached to the extension leaf. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while maintaining overall structural integrity when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second locking part is positioned within the profile channel of the extension rail, creating a nested arrangement where the locking mechanism integrates seamlessly into the existing rail structure without adding excessive external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent leaf lifting, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is extracted as a separate, dedicated mechanism rather than being integrated into the main leaf structure. This allows the locking feature to be added without fundamentally redesigning the extension leaf or rail systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of preventing leaf lifting through complex mechanical interlocks or rigid connections, the solution uses a simple tab-and-slot arrangement where the second tab passes through the first tab's opening, allowing vertical movement restriction while maintaining ease of assembly and disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If tabs with knurled surfaces are used for locking engagement, then locking reliability is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidtab engagement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The knurled surfaces on the tabs introduce a textured, non-planar geometry that increases friction and mechanical interlocking between mating surfaces. This curved/ textured surface approach compensates for minor dimensional variations in tab manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The knurled surface texture changes the surface properties of the tabs, increasing the coefficient of friction and mechanical engagement strength. This parameter change in surface characteristics allows for more tolerant dimensional tolerances in the tab features themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4017316B1Extension table
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 INTER IKEA SYST
  • EP4017316B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4017316B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4017316B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An extension table (2) comprises a plurality of extension rails (4, 6) each extending along the table (2) for adjusting a dimension of the said table (2); an extension leaf (14); and a locking mechanism, comprising a first locking part (16) fixed to an extension rail (4) of the said plurality of extension rails (4, 6); and a second locking part (18) fixed to the extension leaf (14); wherein the first locking part (16) is lockable to the second locking part (18), when the extension leaf (14) is added to the extension table (2), so that the extension leaf (14) is prevented from being lifted upwards.