External Airbag Deployment Using Velocity-Based Detection Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional external airbag deployment systems face challenges in precisely timing deployments to maximize shock absorption and prevent false activations, as they require monitoring a large amount of data and struggle to accurately predict collisions.

Innovation Solution

The method sets a detection area based on the full deployment time and relative velocity of an external airbag, selecting a target object by comparing relative velocity, overlap, and Time To External Airbag (TTE), and deploying the airbag when conditions exceed predetermined levels, while prioritizing objects within the detection area and eliminating those outside it.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a large detection area is monitored to improve collision prediction accuracy, then collision detection capability is improved, but data processing complexity and system response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection area is segmented into multiple zones based on collision risk levels. High-risk zones require detailed monitoring while low-risk zones use simplified detection, allowing the system to focus computational resources where they are most needed for accurate collision prediction without processing unnecessary data from all areas equally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Critical collision prediction parameters are extracted from the full set of detected objects. The system identifies and focuses on objects that meet specific collision criteria (relative velocity, overlap, TTE thresholds) rather than processing data from all detected objects, reducing data processing complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive object detection is performed to improve collision prediction, then detection accuracy is improved, but false deployment risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidfalse deployment risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering of detected objects against collision criteria before initiating airbag deployment. Objects are pre-screened based on relative velocity, overlap, and TTE thresholds, ensuring that only objects meeting all collision conditions trigger deployment, thereby reducing false deployments while maintaining accurate detection of genuine collision risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors multiple parameters (relative velocity, overlap, TTE) and uses feedback loops to verify collision conditions before deployment. The control unit repeatedly checks whether detected objects satisfy all deployment criteria, providing multiple verification opportunities to prevent false deployment while ensuring genuine collisions are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple parameters are monitored to improve deployment accuracy, then deployment precision is improved, but system response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment precisionVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors multiple collision parameters simultaneously but only triggers deployment when a specific combination of thresholds is exceeded. Rather than requiring all parameters to be perfectly measured before action, the system uses predetermined threshold levels for relative velocity, overlap, and TTE that, when collectively satisfied, guarantee accurate deployment timing without requiring exhaustive analysis of every parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9102305B2External airbag deployment method and system
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9102305B2 patent drawing
  • US9102305B2 patent drawing
  • US9102305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an external airbag deployment method of determining whether to deploy an external airbag. The method includes setting, by a controller, a detection area that has a predetermined range and tracking physical characteristics of objects entering the detection area. The detection area is a predetermined area located in front of a vehicle and is set by the controller based on a full deployment time of the external airbag and a relative velocity upon colliding with another object.