Extra-thin Steel Sheet Uniform Elongation via Second Phase Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thin steel sheets with a thickness of 0.400 mm or less face issues with breakage and constriction due to lack of uniform deformation, leading to defects in surface quality and formability, as existing methods prioritize local elongation over uniform elongation.

Innovation Solution

The dispersion of specific second phases with controlled morphology, size, and orientation in the steel sheet, such as acicular oxides or carbides, to enhance hardening while maintaining uniform elongation, involves hot rolling and subsequent processing to maintain anisotropic forms and prevent cracking, ensuring a ferrite matrix with a high volume fraction and strategic distribution of second phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If hardening of material is performed to maintain strength when thinning the steel sheet, then strength is maintained, but formability deteriorates due to lack of uniform deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the microstructural parameters of the steel sheet by controlling the morphology, size, and distribution of second phases (acicular structures with specific aspect ratios). This allows the material to achieve both high strength and improved formability through parameter optimization rather than simple hardening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of a ferrite matrix with dispersed second phases (acicular structures). This composite structure provides both the strength from the hard second phases and the formability from the ductile ferrite matrix, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If conventional hardening methods are used to maintain strength in thin steel sheets, then strength is maintained, but uniform elongation deteriorates due to increased local deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoiduniform elongation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by creating regions with different microstructural characteristics. The second phases are strategically distributed to provide local reinforcement while maintaining overall uniformity. This ensures that deformation is distributed evenly throughout the material rather than concentrating in specific areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes microstructural parameters including the aspect ratio of second phases (≥2.0), their volume fraction (0.05-5.0%), and their spatial distribution. These parameter changes enable the material to maintain strength while achieving uniform elongation by controlling how deformation propagates through the microstructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If the steel sheet is made thinner to reduce raw material cost, then raw material cost decreases, but strength and formability deteriorate due to breakage and constriction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveraw material costVSAvoidstrength and formability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the microstructural parameters (second phase morphology, size, and distribution) to enable thin steel sheets to maintain adequate strength and formability. This allows manufacturers to use thinner sheets for cost reduction without sacrificing mechanical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure in thin steel sheets that provides enhanced mechanical properties. The ferrite matrix with dispersed acicular second phases delivers both strength and formability, enabling thin sheets to withstand forming operations without breakage or constriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a hard, extra-thin steel sheet with improved uniform elongation capacity up to high strained regions, preventing local deformation and constriction, thus enhancing the material's formability and strength.

Implementation Method 1

it belongs to a category of precipitation hardening and transformation hardening, and a material can be hardened by dispersing a second phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation hardening: Precipitation Hardening

Implementation Method 2

it belongs to a category of precipitation hardening and transformation hardening, and a material can be hardened by dispersing a second phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransformation hardening:

Data Source

PatentEP2003221B1Hard extra-thin steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2016.05.25 NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP
  • EP2003221B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2003221B1 patent drawing
  • EP2003221B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A hard extra-thin steel sheet having a sheet thickness of 0.400 mm or less, the sheet contains, by mass%, C: 0 to 0.800%; N: 0 to 0.600%; Si: 0 to 2.0%; Man: 0 to 2.0%; P: 0 to 0.10%; S: 0 to 0.100%;Al: 0 to 3.0%; and O: 0 to 0.200%, and also has, by volume fraction, 0.05% or more of a second phase having an average major axis of 0.10 µm or greater and an average minor axis of 0.05 µm or greater and satisfying average major axis/average minor axis ≥ 2.0.