Airborne Component Extractor Flow Paths for Wide-Area Fume Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fume extraction systems are limited in their ability to effectively draw and remove fumes and smoke from metal working workspaces over a wide area, with a need for improved airflow mechanisms to enhance the distance and volume of extraction.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system using a combination of positive airflow and suction airflow, with adjustable flow rates and configurations such as radial outflow and swirling air patterns, to create an effective air region for enhanced fume and smoke removal, utilizing a base unit with conduits and hoods that direct and filter airborne components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional suction-only systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the extraction distance and volume are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction volumeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines positive airflow (pushing) and negative airflow (suction) systems into a single extractor base unit with integrated blowers and filters. This merging allows the system to achieve greater extraction volume and distance by utilizing both pushing and pulling forces simultaneously, while maintaining a unified compact structure that doesn't excessively increase overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the airflow function into distinct positive pressure and negative pressure streams, each handled by separate blowers (first and second blowers) that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows optimization of each airflow type for specific extraction tasks, expanding the effective extraction volume without requiring a completely redesign of the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If suction airflow alone is used, then the system is easy to operate, but the effective extraction distance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow speedVSAvoidflow rate adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements variable speed control for both the first and second blowers, allowing dynamic adjustment of positive and negative airflow rates. This enables the system to optimize airflow speed for different extraction distances and volumes, while the independent control of each blower provides flexibility in adapting to various operational requirements without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows independent adjustment of flow rates for the positive pressure air stream and negative pressure air stream, enabling optimization of the airflow parameters for different extraction scenarios. By changing the speed and volume parameters of each blower separately, the system can achieve higher effective extraction distances while maintaining ease of operation through straightforward flow rate control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If multiple bends are included in flow paths, then the system is compact, but head requirements and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidbase unit volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs three-dimensional concentric conduit arrangements where the positive pressure conduit is positioned within or adjacent to the negative pressure conduit. This spatial arrangement in multiple dimensions allows the flow paths to be routed efficiently with minimal bends, reducing head requirements and power consumption while keeping the base unit compact through vertical and radial space utilization rather than extended horizontal paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances the capture of airborne components, allowing for effective extraction at greater distances and volumes compared to traditional systems, with adjustable flow rates optimizing the balance between positive and negative pressure air streams for improved performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first blower that generates a positive pressure air stream that is directed toward a work area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive pressure airflow: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a second blower that generates a negative pressure air stream that draws airborne components from the work area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure airflow: Suction

Implementation Method 3

the negative pressure air stream is drawn through a filter before being returned to the work area by the second blower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP2825326B1Airborne component extractor with improved flow paths
Publication Date: 2018.08.08 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP2825326B1 patent drawingFigure 1~1B
  • EP2825326B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2
  • EP2825326B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A component extraction system utilized a base unit that produces a positive pressure air stream and that draws a negative pressure air stream into the base unit. To enhance performance, and reduce head requirements and power consumption, a number of bends in the flow paths is minimized in the base unit.