Neural Activity Detection Using Extraneural Non-Zero-Lag Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recording apparatuses are unable to detect ongoing spontaneous or natural neural activity due to excessive noise, which masks the neural signals, and require invasive methods to achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio.

Innovation Solution

A method involving correlation analysis of electrical signals received from pairs of electrodes located outside the perineurium of a nerve, utilizing non-zero lag times to enhance signal detection and distinguish neural activity from noise, allowing for minimally invasive chronic implantation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional recording apparatus is used to detect neural activity, then the device can record evoked neural activity in response to artificial stimulation, but it cannot record ongoing spontaneous or natural neural activity due to excessive noise in the signal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidexcessive noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces correlation analysis as an intermediary processing step between the raw electrical signals and the final neural activity detection. By computing correlation coefficients between signals from multiple electrode pairs, the system extracts neural activity information that is buried in noise, effectively separating the harmful noise from the useful signal without requiring direct penetration of the perineurium.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical penetration of the perineurium (invasive approach) with a non-invasive correlation analysis method. Instead of physically penetrating the nerve sheath to achieve high signal-to-noise ratio, the system uses signal processing to extract neural activity from extraneural recordings, substituting mechanical invasion with computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If electrodes are placed inside the perineurium to achieve high signal-to-noise ratio, then neural activity can be detected accurately, but the implantation becomes invasive and reduces device longevity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoiddevice longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses correlation analysis as an intermediary that enables accurate neural activity detection without direct electrode-nerve contact. The correlation processing step extracts neural signals from extraneural recordings, eliminating the need for perineural electrode placement and its associated invasiveness and longevity issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical approach of penetrating the perineurium with a computational approach using correlation analysis. This replacement maintains measurement precision while eliminating the harmful mechanical invasion, thereby improving device reliability and longevity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If correlation analysis is applied to electrical signals from electrode pairs outside the perineurium, then spontaneous neural activity can be detected without invasive penetration, but the signal-to-noise ratio is initially low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimally invasiveVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces correlation analysis as an intermediary processing step that operates on extraneural signals from electrode pairs outside the perineurium. This intermediary computation enhances the signal-to-noise ratio by extracting correlated neural activity patterns, enabling detection without invasive penetration while achieving sufficient measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical penetration of the perineurium with computational correlation analysis. This substitution maintains minimal invasiveness while achieving the necessary signal-to-noise ratio through signal processing, allowing neural activity detection without physical invasion of the nerve sheath.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3979903B1Method and system for detecting neural activity
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 THE BIONICS INST OF AUSTRALIA
  • EP3979903B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3979903B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3979903B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method of detecting neural activity in a nerve is disclosed. A first electrical signal is received from a first pair of electrodes. A second electrical signal is received from a second pair of electrodes, the second pair of electrodes being spaced from the first pair of electrodes along the nerve. A correlation analysis is applied between the first and second electrical signals, including for at least one non-zero lag time, to obtain correlation data. From the correlation data, at least one neural signal is detected, indicative of neural activity in the nerve. The neural signal corresponds to increased correlation between the first and second signals at the at least one non-zero lag time.