Extruded Airdam J-Shape Dual-Durometer Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing airdams struggle to maintain aerodynamic performance while being low to the ground without sustaining damage from contact with obstacles like driveway ramps and parking curbs, and they fail to effectively deflect under increasing wind forces at higher vehicle speeds.

Innovation Solution

An airdam with a J-shaped cross-section and a co-extruded body featuring a harder upper section and a softer lower section, along with a forward tilt angle and a curved lip, allowing for deflection without damage and maintaining effectiveness under wind forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the airdam is made as low to the ground as possible to improve aerodynamic performance, then lift and drag reduction is enhanced, but the airdam becomes susceptible to damage from contact with obstacles like driveway ramps and parking curbs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoiddamage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The airdam incorporates a dual-durometer construction where the upper section (above the forward tilt angle) is made from a harder material (40-65 Shore D) to provide structural strength and resistance to damage, while the lower section (below the forward tilt angle) is made from a softer material (55-80 Shore A) to provide flexibility and deflect upon contact with obstacles. This local differentiation of material properties allows the airdam to simultaneously achieve aerodynamic effectiveness at low ground clearance and damage resistance through selective material hardness distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the airdam is made from soft rubber material to allow deflection without damage, then durability is improved, but the airdam may become ineffective at higher vehicle speeds when forced to deflect rearwardly by wind forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage resistanceVSAvoidaerodynamic effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-durometer construction addresses this contradiction by placing the harder material in the upper section that resists excessive rearward deflection from wind forces, while the softer lower section maintains flexibility to deflect upon contact with obstacles. The forward tilt angle geometry further ensures that the harder upper section maintains its aerodynamic profile under wind load while the softer lower section absorbs impact deflections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the airdam body is made from a single hard material to prevent damage, then structural integrity is improved, but the airdam cannot deflect upon contact with obstacles without sustaining damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoiddeflection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The airdam employs different durometer materials in different sections: the upper section uses harder material (40-65 Shore D) for structural integrity and damage resistance, while the lower section uses softer material (55-80 Shore A) for deflection capability when contacting obstacles. This localized material property differentiation allows each section to perform its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The airdam body is constructed as a composite structure combining two rubber materials with different durometer ratings in a co-extruded configuration. This composite construction integrates the advantages of both hard and soft materials into a single unified component, achieving both structural integrity and deflection capability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The airdam effectively reduces lift and drag by deflecting upon contact with obstacles and adjusting to wind forces, maintaining its shape and functionality while preventing structural damage, thus enhancing aerodynamic performance and durability.

Implementation Method 1

an airdam that can be as low to the ground as possible while also not becoming damaged during everyday use from contact with driveway ramps, parking curbs or other roadway and parking obstacles. This document relates to airdam embodiments made from a relatively soft rubber material that will deflect or bend when contacted by the ground or other objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the airdam embodiments are designed with a forward tilt angle allowing the airdam to maintain effectiveness even as it is forced to deflect rearwardly by wind forces as vehicle speeds increase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS9623917B2Extruded airdam for reducing the lift and drag of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9623917B2 patent drawing
  • US9623917B2 patent drawing
  • US9623917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An airdam is provided for a motor vehicle. The airdam includes an extruded body having a J-shaped cross-section defining a forward tilt angle and a curved lip. The body may include a crescent shaped profile or a bell curve shaped profile.