Extruded Control Surface Structure for Impact-Resistant UAV Wings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing flight control surfaces for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are either labor-intensive, result in heavy and thick parts, or are prone to damage due to the use of molded foam wings, which are susceptible to denting and require frequent replacement.

Innovation Solution

The development of an extruded control surface with a channel, knuckle, leading and trailing voids, and separators, along with clips and cuffs, made from UV-resistant plastic or polycarbonate-ABS, which allows for lightweight, inexpensive, and structurally strong control surfaces that can pivot and absorb impact, protecting the wings during take-off and landing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If molded foam wings are used for UAVs, then the wings are lightweight and easy to manufacture, but they are susceptible to denting and require frequent replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidresistance to denting
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The wing assembly is segmented into multiple components: the molded foam wing structure and separate extruded control surfaces. This segmentation allows the foam wing to maintain its lightweight and easy manufacturing advantages while the extruded control surfaces provide the necessary structural protection and durability, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and resistance to damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution employs composite construction by combining molded foam material for the wing structure with extruded plastic control surfaces. This composite approach leverages the advantages of each material: the foam provides lightweight structure while the extruded plastic components provide durability and damage resistance, thereby resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional manufacturing methods (lay-up or injection molding) are used for control surfaces, then the control surfaces can be manufactured, but they result in thicker and heavier parts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidweight of control surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the manufacturing parameter from traditional lay-up or injection molding methods to extrusion process. This parameter change enables the production of control surfaces with optimized wall thickness and reduced material usage, resulting in lighter control surfaces while maintaining structural integrity and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional manufacturing methods are used for control surfaces, then the control surfaces can be constructed, but the process requires manual labor and is labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the manufacturing parameter from labor-intensive lay-up or injection molding processes to an extrusion process. This parameter change enables continuous production of control surfaces with consistent quality, reducing manual labor requirements and significantly improving manufacturing efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the weight and complexity of control surfaces, enhances structural integrity, and allows for easy replacement of damaged components, minimizing repair costs and extending the operational life of UAVs by acting as disposable wing protectors.

Implementation Method 1

where the knuckle deforms to accept the pin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3538436B1Extruded wing protection system and device
Publication Date: 2024.01.03 AEROVIRONMENT INC
  • EP3538436B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3538436B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3538436B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods for an extruded wing protection and control surface (126) comprising: a channel (206) proximate a leading edge (202) of the control surface, a knuckle (210) disposed about the channel, a leading void (212), a trailing void (214), and a separator (216) dividing the leading void and the trailing void; and a plurality of notches (200) disposed in the extruded control surface proximate the leading edge of the control surface.