Extruded End Cap With Cast Closure For Compressed Gas Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing end caps for compressed gas filters, particularly those formed by casting, face challenges such as porosity, increased production costs, and complex approval processes due to imperfections, whereas extruded components offer lower costs and reduced rejection rates but require stringent sealing and machining, which can lead to inefficiencies and cross-contamination.

Innovation Solution

An end cap with a substantially tubular body formed by extrusion, featuring a plurality of apertures and an insert with conduit portions that direct gas flow evenly, reducing production costs and improving sealing and flow consistency, while using extruded aluminum for its high tensile strength and ease of anodization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If end cap is formed by casting, then production cost increases and approval process becomes complex, but sealing quality improves and porosity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing qualityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is divided into two separate parts: an extruded body portion and a cast closure portion. This segmentation allows each part to be manufactured using the most suitable process for its specific requirements, resolving the contradiction between sealing quality and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The extruded body portion and cast closure portion are joined together through threading and sealing mechanisms. This merging combines the advantages of both manufacturing methods: the extrusion process provides cost-effectiveness and consistent sealing surfaces, while the casting process ensures high reliability and eliminates porosity in the closure portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If end cap is formed by casting, then sealing quality improves, but production cost and approval complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing qualityVSAvoidapproval process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the end cap into extruded and cast portions, the approval process complexity is reduced. The extruded body portion can be certified once for a family of components, while only the closure portion requires individual certification, simplifying the overall approval process compared to certiating an entirely cast end cap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If end cap is formed by extrusion, then production cost decreases and rejection rate reduces, but porosity increases and sealing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidsealing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The critical sealing portions (closure and interface surfaces) are manufactured by casting to ensure high reliability and eliminate porosity, while the non-critical body portion is extruded for cost-effectiveness. This segmentation ensures sealing quality is maintained where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different manufacturing processes are applied to different parts of the end cap based on their specific functional requirements. The closure portion requires high sealing quality and is cast, while the body portion prioritizes cost-effectiveness and is extruded, achieving local optimization of quality and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If machining is performed on cast end cap, then sealing surfaces are created, but porosity is exposed and sealing becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing surface creationVSAvoidsealing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing surfaces are created during the extrusion process itself, before any machining is required. The extrusion process produces ready-to-use sealing surfaces that do not expose internal porosity, eliminating the problem of machining-induced sealing issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The extruded end cap design reduces production costs, enhances sealing, and ensures consistent gas flow, minimizing high-speed spots and cross-contamination, thus improving the efficiency and reliability of compressed air filtration.

Implementation Method 1

a substantially tubular body portion formed by extrusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExtrusion: Extrusion

Implementation Method 2

ease of anodization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnodization: Anodising

Data Source

PatentEP3077079B1An end cap for an assembly used in the preparation of compressed gas
Publication Date: 2020.09.16 NORGREN LTD
  • EP3077079B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3077079B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3077079B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An End Cap for an Assembly Used in the Preparation of Compressed Gas An end cap for attaching to one or more filter elements and respective filter bowls is disclosed. The end cap has a tubular body formed by extrusion and this body has a series of apertures formed therein. The apertures include an end aperture for attachment to a filter bowl and another end aperture for attachment to another filter bowl or to a sealing disc. The body also has a pair of sidewall apertures to act as inlet and outlet the filter assembly. The end cap also has a plastic insert for insertion into the body, the insert having a conduit portion for directing a stream of gas from the inlet to a filter element through one of the end apertures.