Eye Tracking Content Management for Viewer Interest Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tracking techniques for determining viewer interest in content are unreliable, as they rely on user inputs like mouse clicks and set-top box data, which do not accurately reflect genuine interest, and fail to differentiate between levels of interest such as mild, moderate, or passing interest.

Innovation Solution

A content management system that tracks user visual gaze information to determine engagement levels by analyzing eye movements and focus duration, adjusting content presentation such as size and volume based on interest, and providing analytics to improve content delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional tracking techniques (mouse clicks, set-top box data) are used to determine viewer interest, then implementation is simple and device complexity is low, but measurement precision of viewer interest is poor and reliability is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewer interest measurementVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical input methods (mouse clicks, remote controls) with optical tracking technology. Eye tracking cameras capture and analyze eye movements, pupil dilation, and visual focus to determine genuine viewer interest, substituting physical interaction with optical measurement for more accurate results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that processes raw eye tracking data (gaze position, fixation duration, pupil size) to derive meaningful engagement metrics. This intermediary processing layer transforms complex optical data into actionable viewer interest indicators, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional tracking systems are used, then device complexity is low, but the system cannot differentiate between levels of interest (mild, moderate, high interest)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterest level differentiationVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments viewer interest into multiple distinct levels (mild, moderate, high interest) by analyzing different eye tracking metrics. Fixation duration, gaze stability, and pupil dilation are segmented and weighted to classify interest intensity, enabling the system to differentiate between various levels of engagement rather than providing a binary interested/not interested determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in physiological parameters (pupil diameter, blink rate, saccade frequency) to detect and differentiate interest levels. By monitoring how these parameters change over time during content consumption, the system adapts its assessment to distinguish between casual viewing and deep engagement, adding versatility without requiring fundamentally different hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If eye tracking technology is implemented to accurately measure viewer interest, then measurement precision and reliability improve, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewer interest tracking reliabilityVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates eye tracking functionality into existing display devices, making the tracking system multi-functional. The same hardware components (cameras, processors) serve both traditional display functions and eye tracking measurements, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high reliability in viewer interest assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges eye tracking technology with conventional display systems by combining the camera modules, processing units, and control interfaces into a unified system. This integration consolidates components and reduces the complexity increment that would result from adding separate tracking hardware, while achieving reliable measurement of viewer interest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10242379B2Tracking visual gaze information for controlling content display
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 ADOBE INC
  • US10242379B2 patent drawing
  • US10242379B2 patent drawing
  • US10242379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed toward tracking visual gaze information. Methods and systems of the present disclosure track a visual gaze of a user with respect to a display of a computing device. In particular, one or more embodiments track a visual gaze of a user with respect to content on a display. The methods and systems can use information about the visual gaze of the user for use in improving the presentation of content. For example, the systems and methods can increase a display size or volume of content in response to the visual gaze of the user. Still further, the methods and systems can use the visual gaze information for providing analytics regarding the viewing habits of the user.