Eye Tracking Control for Particle Beam Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current particle beam devices, such as electron and ion beam systems, require cumbersome and error-prone manual adjustments of control parameters for imaging and processing, leading to inefficient operation and potential misconfiguration.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an eye-tracking system that identifies and adjusts control parameters visually, allowing for intuitive and precise changes to settings like contrast, brightness, and beam positioning, reducing the risk of errors and improving operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of control parameters is used, then the device can be operated with simple controls, but the operation becomes cumbersome and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of parameter adjustmentVSAvoidaccuracy of parameter configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an eye-tracking system that uses optical detection of eye movements to automatically adjust control parameters. The eye tracker detects gaze position and duration, triggering automated parameter changes without physical contact, thereby eliminating manual errors while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation by automatically adjusting parameters based on the operator's gaze patterns. When the eye tracker detects that the operator is looking at a specific parameter or control element for a predetermined duration, the system autonomously makes the appropriate adjustment, freeing the operator from manual adjustment tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated eye-tracking control is implemented, then operational efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The eye tracker serves multiple functions: it detects operator attention, determines which parameter needs adjustment, validates the correctness of adjustments through continued gaze monitoring, and can trigger different types of controls (sliders, buttons, numerical inputs). This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The eye tracker acts as an intermediary between the operator's intent and the system's response. Rather than direct manual manipulation, the operator's gaze serves as the input signal, and the system translates gaze patterns into appropriate parameter adjustments, creating a natural and efficient interaction bridge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If precise manual control is required, then parameter accuracy can be maintained, but the adjustment process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of parameter settingVSAvoidtime for parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by anticipating the operator's needs through gaze detection. When the operator looks at a parameter that requires adjustment, the system prepares and executes the adjustment automatically, eliminating the time lag between identifying the needed change and actually making it, while maintaining precision through validated gaze-triggered execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The eye-tracking system provides continuous feedback about the operator's attention state. By monitoring gaze position and duration, the system receives feedback on which parameters need adjustment and validates when adjustments are complete, creating a closed-loop control system that achieves precise parameter setting efficiently through automated feedback-driven adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10658152B1Method for controlling a particle beam device and particle beam device for carrying out the method
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US10658152B1 patent drawing
  • US10658152B1 patent drawing
  • US10658152B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a particle beam device for imaging, analyzing and/or processing an object, and a particle beam device for carrying out the method. The particle beam device may be an electron beam device and/or or an ion beam device. The method may include identifying at least one control parameter of a unit of the particle beam device using an eye tracker by tracking at least one eye of a user of the particle beam device, and changing the at least one control parameter of the unit of the particle beam device.