Multi-Axis Eyewear Hinge for Over-Extension Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for supporting temple arms of spatial computing headsets are overly complex, bulky, lack precision and have a limited range of motion, and include vulnerable components that are not effectively addressed by existing technologies, including existing technologies for spatial computing headsets, which may suffer from over-extension, extreme deflections, and torsional loading.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multiple degree of freedom hinge systems that allow temple arms to rotate about at least two axes, namely a pitch axis and a yaw axis, with integrated biasing members to prevent over-extension and extreme deflections, while maintaining a compact form factor and concealing the hinge systems within the optics assembly and temple arms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional hinge systems are used to support temple arms, then the structure is simple, but the system is bulky, complex, and lacks precision with limited range of motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge system precisionVSAvoidhinge system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge system is divided into multiple independent hinge assemblies, each with specific degrees of freedom (pitch and yaw axes). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall system precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge system incorporates dynamic elements including biasing members that provide rotational bias, and allows the temple arms to rotate about multiple axes (pitch and yaw) to adapt to different positions and orientations, enhancing precision while managing complexity through controlled flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If temple arms are allowed to move freely, then the range of motion is increased, but the temple arms become vulnerable to over-extension and extreme deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemple arm range of motionVSAvoidprotection against over-extension
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Biasing members are incorporated into the hinge system to apply preliminary counteracting forces that prevent over-extension and extreme deflections of the temple arms. These biasing members create restoring torques that automatically counteract excessive movements before they can cause damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge system allows controlled dynamic movement of temple arms about pitch and yaw axes while incorporating biasing members that dynamically adjust to limit extreme deflections. This creates a balanced system that provides adequate range of motion while maintaining reliability through automatic mechanical feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of moving object

If hinge systems are integrated into the optics assembly, then the form factor is compact, but the hinge systems must be concealed within limited space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadset volumeVSAvoidhinge system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge assemblies are nested within the optics assembly structure, with hinge components integrated into the existing framework. This nesting approach allows the hinge system to be concealed within the limited space of the optics assembly while maintaining a compact overall form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge system is merged with the optics assembly structure, combining the support function with the existing framework. This integration reduces the need for separate components and allows the hinge mechanism to be concealed within the optics assembly, achieving a compact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hinge systems provide enhanced stability and protection against torsional loading, allowing for secure fitting and reduced wear on the optics assembly, while maintaining a flexible circuit passage and enabling multiple degrees of freedom for temple arm movement.

Implementation Method 1

The hinge base may include a biasing member configured to rotationally bias the intermediate hinge member about the pitch axis toward a neutral configuration when the intermediate hinge member is displaced from the neutral configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4107350B1Multiple degree of freedom hinge systems and eyewear devices comprising such hinge systems
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 MAGIC LEAP INC
  • EP4107350B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4107350B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4107350B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A multiple degree of freedom hinge system is provided, which is particularly well adapted for eyewear, such as spatial computing headsets. In the context of such spatial computing headsets having an optics assembly supported 5 by opposing temple arms, the hinge system provides protection against over-extension of the temple arms or extreme deflections that may otherwise arise from undesirable torsional loading of the temple arms. The hinge systems also allow the temple arms to splay outwardly to enable proper fit and enhanced user comfort.