Fabricable Segmented Design via Paintbrush Material Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for designing optical and electromagnetic devices often fail to consider fabricability, leading to designs that may not be feasible for manufacturing, especially as device complexity and feature sizes decrease.

Innovation Solution

A computing system-based method that generates a fabricable segmented design by receiving a design specification, updating material and touch statuses, and repeating the process until all segments are associated with a material, ensuring the design can be fabricated using a specific fabrication system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If design parameters are increased to optimize device performance, then device functionality is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases and fabricability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidfabricability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the device design into discrete units (e.g., pixels, meta-atoms, or functional blocks) that can be independently controlled and fabricated. This segmentation allows complex high-functionality devices to be broken down into manufacturable units, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary design optimization and fabricability assessment before actual manufacturing. By pre-determining which design parameters are fabricable and adjusting the design accordingly, the system avoids the need to modify designs later in the manufacturing process, thus maintaining both high functionality and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If device feature sizes are decreased to improve performance, then device functionality is enhanced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidfeature size precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the device into discrete units with standardized dimensions, the patent enables precise control over feature sizes. Each segment can be fabricated with controlled precision using standard manufacturing processes, allowing small feature sizes to be achieved without excessively high precision requirements across the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies design parameters within defined ranges to optimize device functionality while maintaining manufacturability. By establishing parameter ranges that balance performance and manufacturing precision, the system achieves enhanced functionality without requiring extreme manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If design optimization is performed without considering fabrication constraints, then theoretical performance is maximized, but actual fabricability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheoretical performanceVSAvoidfabricability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where fabrication constraints and manufacturing capabilities are continuously fed back into the design optimization process. This closed-loop approach ensures that theoretical performance optimization does not diverge from actual fabricability, as design adjustments are made based on manufacturing feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of fabrication constraints before finalizing the design. By evaluating manufacturing capabilities, material availability, and process limitations in advance, the system optimizes designs that are both theoretically performant and actually fabricable, avoiding the need for redesign later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11157163B1Paintbrush-like techniques for determining fabricable segmented designs
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 X DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US11157163B1 patent drawing
  • US11157163B1 patent drawing
  • US11157163B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for ensuring fabricability of segmented designs are provided. In some embodiments, a computing system receives a design specification to be used to create a proposed segmented design. Each segment of the proposed segmented design indicates a material within the segment. The proposed segmented design includes segments that indicate at least two different materials. The computing system chooses a segment to touch with a paintbrush pattern for a first material. The computing system updates a set of material statuses for each material based on the chosen segment. The computing system updates a set of touch statuses for each material based on the chosen segment. The choosing and updating actions are repeated until all segments are associated with a material. The computing system generates the proposed segmented design based on the sets of material statuses.