Face Annotation Filtering via Caption Similarity Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for generating annotated face images for training machine learning models are labor-intensive and result in inaccurate search indexing due to irrelevant captions, especially when using large datasets like stock photos or web-crawled images that are not specifically labeled for face descriptions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving face detection algorithms to crop images, compare the cropped faces to their corresponding captions to calculate similarity scores, and filter out irrelevant captions, thereby creating a set of annotated face images that are relevant and efficient for training machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation of face images is performed, then annotation accuracy is improved, but labor time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidlabor time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary face detection and cropping on images before caption assignment. By pre-processing images to extract face regions and generate initial captions using AI models, the system reduces the manual annotation workload while maintaining accuracy through subsequent verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary verification mechanism that uses AI-generated captions and similarity scoring to filter and validate face-caption pairs before final annotation. This intermediary layer reduces manual labor by automatically eliminating irrelevant captions while preserving annotation accuracy through quality filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If unaltered captions from original images are used for cropped faces, then annotation speed is improved, but caption relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation speedVSAvoidcaption relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and compares key terms from original captions with face-specific attributes detected in cropped images. By separating relevant face-descriptive terms from irrelevant background information in captions, the system maintains annotation speed while improving caption relevance through selective extraction of meaningful content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism using similarity scoring that compares cropped face images with their associated captions. Captions with low similarity scores are automatically filtered or flagged for revision, ensuring that only relevant captions are used for training data while maintaining high annotation throughput through automated quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If large datasets like stock photos are used, then data quantity is improved, but data quality deteriorates due to irrelevant captions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedataset sizeVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the quality parameter by implementing a similarity scoring threshold that filters out low-quality face-caption pairs from large datasets. By adjusting this parameter, the system can process large volumes of stock photos and web-crawled images while automatically removing irrelevant entries, thus maintaining high data quality despite the large input dataset size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards irrelevant captions from large datasets through automated filtering based on similarity scoring, then recovers and retains only the high-quality face-caption pairs that meet the quality threshold. This process enables the system to leverage large datasets for quantity while ensuring data quality through selective retention of relevant annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20230316803A1Systems and methods for face annotation
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 ADOBE INC
  • US20230316803A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316803A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316803A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for face annotation are described. One or more of the systems and methods include receiving a plurality of annotated images, wherein each annotated image of the annotated images comprises a caption; cropping the annotated image based on a face detection algorithm to obtain a face crop; comparing the face crop to the caption corresponding to the annotated image to obtain a caption similarity score; and filtering the plurality of annotated images based on the caption similarity score to obtain a plurality of annotated face images.